DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Babineaux v. Giblin, 37 So. 2d 877.

14 citing documents.

  • Mayes v. DEEP SOUTH CHEMICAL, INC. 66 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Ralph Mayes v. Deep South Chemical, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Mayes v. Deep South Chemical, Inc. 66 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Davis v. Home Insurance Company 291 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
  • Gautreaux v. Life Insurance Company of Georgia 256 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    App. 4 Cir. 1971); (La.App.
  • Matthews v. Milwhite Mud Sales Co. 225 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    Vincent v. Service Contracting, Inc., (La.App.
  • Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc. 217 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    where recovery was denied for death occurring some 1.4 miles from the employment while the employee was driving his own car to work *730 from his home in another city.
  • Abraham v. De Felice Marine Contractors, Inc. 200 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Cf. Babineaux v. Giblin, La.App., .
  • Hay v. Travelers Insurance Company 106 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    928 , ; Babineaux v. Giblin, La.App., .
  • Ferrara v. City of New Orleans 100 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Babineaux v. Giblin, La.App.1948, .
  • Le Blanc v. Travelers Ins. Co. 68 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    decided by this Court, wherein it is set forth: *912 “The general rule under the Workmen's Compensation law of this State is that an injury suffered by an employee away from his employer’s premises, while going to or returning from work, does not arise out of and in the course of.
  • Doyle v. Penton Lumber Co. 56 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    The facts of his case, in my opinion, do not justify an application of the "Proximity Rule", but should be governed by the rule as expressed in Walker v. Lykes Brothers-Ripley S. S. Co. See also Babineaux v. Giblin, La.App., ; Wyatt v. Alabama Petroleum Corp., 2 La.
  • Guient v. Mathieson Chemical Corporation 41 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , 878, whilst the general rule is to the effect that an injury sustained by an employee away from the employer's premises while going to and returning from his work, does not arise out of and in the course of his employment, there are three definite exceptions which were enumerated and the third mentioned is the one t
  • Attaway v. Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York 39 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , 879, in which the Court recognized the general rule that an injury suffered by an employee away from his employer's premises does not arise out of and in the course of his employment, but recognized the three exceptions to the general rule as were set forth by the Orleans Court of Appeal in the Walker case.