Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation, 130 So. 1.

23 citing documents.

James v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co. 175 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Gant v. Jackson Brewing Company 112 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 112 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
453 , ; Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas Company, 1930, , 130 So.
Bonacorso v. Turnley 98 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Art. 2095, LSA-Civil Code; [2] , 130 So.
Wysinger v. Godfrey 86 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Cahee v. United States Casualty Co. 86 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Belaire v. Elder 49 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
This theory was applied in Owers v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Company, La.App., , , 130 So.
Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co. 40 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Whitman v. Central Surety Insurance Corporation 41 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Grant v. Consolidated Underwriters 33 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Owers v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Co. 14 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Wilson v. Roberts 194 So. 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
In the case of Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. , 130 So.
Dandridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 192 So. 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
McKay v. Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. 189 So. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
311 ; Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. , 130 So.
Weldon v. Pickering Lumber Corporation 186 So. 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
130 So: 1; Carter v. Colfax Lumber Company, 9 La.App.
Brister v. Miller 178 So. 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
James v. Dear & Johnson, Inc. 172 So. 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Brasher v. Industrial Lumber Co. 165 So. 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Hollingsworth v. Crossett Lumber Co. 165 So. 311 La. 1935
Hollinsworth v. Crossett Lumber Co. 153 So. 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Windham v. Newport Co. 143 So. 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
eferred to as contractor) for the execution by or under the contractor of the whole or any part of the work undertaken by the principal, the principal shall be liable to pay to any employee * * * or his dependent any compensation under this act which he would have been liable to pay if that employee had been immediately employed by him.” , 130 So.
Lee v. Mark H. Brown Lumber Co. 131 So. 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
200 , ), we do not think that by adding the phrase “other than manual labor” to the usual definition of an independent contractor, there was any intention to exclude from the benefit of the statute any person theretofore included.
Horrell v. Gulf & Valley Cotton Oil Co. 131 So. 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930