DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mulhern v. Hayne, 132 So. 659.

20 citing documents.

  • Kalmn, Inc. v. Walker Louisiana Properties 488 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    "Defendants argue that when the Homer Tate Mineral lease was executed, the law of Louisiana was to the effect that when a landowner joins the mineral right owner as a lessor in a mineral lease, he thereby recognized the rights of his co-lessor and interrupted the course of the prescriptive period, , 132 So.
  • Uzee v. Bollinger 178 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Armour v. Smith 170 So. 2d 347 La. 1964
  • Namie v. Namie 134 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Some confusion has arisen with respect to the holding in the case of Mulhern v. Hayne, et al., , 132 So.
  • Adam v. Johnson 133 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
  • Nolen v. Bennett 119 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Later decisions, however, commencing with Mulhern v. Hayne, 1931, , 132 So.
  • Elkins v. Roseberry 96 So. 2d 41 La. 1957
    However, the court, , 132 So.
  • Followed Delta Refining Co. v. Bankhead 73 So. 2d 302 La. 1954
    There must be more than a bare acknowledgment; the acknowledgment must be accompanied by or coupled with ‘the purpose and intention of the party making the acknowledgment to interrupt the prescription then running.’ ” The Court, in the Bremer case, supra, , 132 So.
  • Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Miller 69 So. 2d 21 La. 1953
    However, the court, , 132 So.
  • Gulf Refining Co. v. Goode 32 So. 2d 904 La. 1947
    Qearly not applicable here are the several cases cited by appellants’ counsel that deal with the effect of signing a joint lease, , 132 So.
  • Baker v. Wilder 16 So. 2d 346 La. 1943
    Their contention is that this was a “joint lease”, and they cite, and rely principally on, , 132 So.
  • Spears v. Nesbitt 2 So. 2d 650 La. 1941
    d the company’s rights within the meaning and contemplation of Article 3520 of the Revised Civil Code and interrupted the prescription then running against the servitude on the entire tract of 120 acres, the portion lying in the west half of Section 29 N.% of the N.W.%), as well as the portion lying in the east half thereof (N.W.]4 of the N.E.%), , 132 So.
  • Achee v. Caillouet 1 So. 2d 530 La. 1941
    In their application for rehearing, counsel for defendants say that our original opinion and decree are erroneous because we erred (1) , 132 So.
  • Brown v. Sugar Creek Syndicate 197 So. 583 La. 1940
    At the time of the unitization agreement and division order in 1931, , 132 So.
  • Hightower v. Maritzky 195 So. 518 La. 1940
  • Vincent v. Bullock 187 So. 35 La. 1939
    Plaintiffs’ next contention is that the fact that the lease above referred to dated February 19, 1936, is for a primary term of three years, coupled with the stipulations in the several acts above referred to, the term thereof extending beyond the prescriptive period of ten years, , 132 So.
  • English v. Blackman 179 So. 306 La. 1938
  • Kennedy v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co. 178 So. 359 La. 1938
    Conceding that, , 132 So.
  • Ventress v. Akin 177 So. 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    “In my opinion the facts in the case at bar are not applicable to the Mulhern Case (Mulhern v. Hayne), , 132 So.
  • Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co. 171 So. 75 La. 1936