Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Petroleum Co. v. Broussard, 135 So. 1.

15 citing documents.

Indigo Minerals, LLC v. Pardee Minerals, LLC 37 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Ashland Oil Co., Inc. v. Palo Alto, Inc. 615 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
519, 523 (1938); , 135 So.
Continental Group, Inc. v. Allison 404 So. 2d 428 La. 1981
Louisiana Petroleum Co. v. Broussard, et al, , 135 So.
Armstrong v. Red River, Atchafalaya & Bayou Bouef Levee Board 261 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In the area of prescription for non-use, the crucial determination in every case is the purpose for which the servitude is granted because “to use a servitude, so as to interrupt prescription, is to use it in the manner contemplated by the grant or reservation.” , 135 So.
Barnwell, Inc. v. Carter 220 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 132 So. 2d 845 La. 1961
Kellogg Bros., Inc. v. SINGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 131 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
591 ; Louisiana Petroleum Company v. Broussard, 1931, , 135 So.
White v. Frank B. Treat & Son, Inc. 89 So. 2d 883 La. 1956
“To use a servitude, so as to effect an interruption of prescription, is to use it in the manner, contemplated by the grant or reservation.” , 135 So.
Boddie v. Drewett 87 So. 2d 516 La. 1956
McMurrey v. Gray 45 So. 2d 73 La. 1949
Hunter Co. v. Ulrich 8 So. 2d 531 La. 1942
Ohio Oil Co. v. Cox 198 So. 902 La. 1940
Lynn v. Harrington 192 So. 517 La. 1939
Goldsmith v. McCoy 182 So. 519 La. 1938
Conceding, however, that the exploration was made upon plaintiff’s land, this Court has repeatedly held 'that “to use a servitude, so as to interrupt prescription, is to use it in the manner contemplated by the grant or reservation.” , 135 So.
Calhoun v. Ardis 141 So. 15 La. 1932
157, 161; Palmer Corporation v. Moore, supra; , 135 So.