Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Kron, 135 So. 19.
- Newsom v. Boothe 524 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- Succession of Raiford 404 So. 2d 251 La. 1981
- Succession of Greer v. Wiggins 315 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Succession of Boyd 306 So. 2d 687 La. 1975
- Land v. Succession of Newsom 193 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
-
Succession of Gafford
180 So. 2d 74
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
This results perhaps from the decision in the , 135 So.
-
Succession of Koerkel
174 So. 2d 213
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
In the first Succession of Gaudin, supra, this court reasoned that , 135 So.
-
Succession of Gaudin
140 So. 2d 384
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
215 (1916), and , 135 So.
- Succession of Bendily 132 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Succession of Gaudin 98 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Succession of Mutin 94 So. 2d 420 La. 1957
- Succession of Morales 94 So. 2d 420 La. 1957
-
Succession of Sarrazin
65 So. 2d 602
La. 1953
ave held that if the date of an olographic will is not entirely written by the testator, that if there is an omission of the day, month, or year, or if the words or figures used to express the date are not plain or are so arranged as to leave room for doubt or speculation as to the exact date meant to be written by the testator, the will is void for want of a sufficient date.” , 135 So.
- Succession of Torlage 12 So. 2d 683 La. 1943
-
Succession of Lasseigne
181 So. 879
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
■ However in a subsequent decision, , 135 So.
- Picard v. Succession of Picard 155 So. 11 La. 1934
- Jones v. Coleman 149 So. 513 La. 1933
- Succession of Coleman 149 So. 513 La. 1933
- Succession of Caro 143 So. 355 La. 1932
- Succession of Wenling 135 So. 21 La. 1931