Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mayre v. Pierson, 133 So. 163.

19 citing documents.

Sabine Production Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust 432 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Curtis v. Curtis 388 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
That statutory construction of sale-resale in Barnes is disapproved by Mayre v. Pierson, 1931, , 133 So.
New Orleans Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pharr 377 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Fontenot v. Fontenot 339 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Ascension Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Martinez 308 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Succession of Lewis 157 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
Bagala v. Bagala 110 So. 2d 526 La. 1959
% % ~ * “ , the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans was confronted with the identical question here presented and properly held that the case was controlled by the ruling in Mayre v. Pierson, supra [ , 133 So.
Reagan v. Murphy 105 So. 2d 210 La. 1958
Ruffino v. Hunt 99 So. 2d 34 La. 1958
Lazaro v. Lazaro 92 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
[12] In explaining the ramifications of the foregoing provision of the Homestead Law the Supreme Court in Mayre v. Pierson, supra, said [ , 133 So.
Robinson v. Allen 88 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Hausler v. Nuccio 39 So. 2d 734 La. 1949
In interpreting this, provision this court, , 133 So.
Betz v. Riviere 29 So. 2d 465 La. 1947
Capillon v. Chambliss 29 So. 2d 171 La. 1946
In a case not referred to by either of the attorneys here, namely, , 133 So.
Thomas v. Thomas 27 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
If a challenge had been made, , 133 So.
In Re Standard Homestead Ass'n 22 So. 2d 119 La. 1945
They were so declared in Act 151 of 1888, , 133 So.
Investors Homestead Ass'n v. Anglada 192 So. 69 La. 1939
However, counsel for plaintiff have abandoned that theory, because in their brief at page 4 they say: “This property did not become community property by the sale and resale”; , 133 So.
Treigle v. Acme Homestead Ass'n 160 So. 637 La. 1935
The objects and purposes for which building and loan associations are created, and the business carried on by them, are matters of “public utility and advantage.” It was so declared by the Legislature itself by Act No. 151 of 1888, , 133 So.
First Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Tax Commission 143 So. 23 La. 1932