Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nahoum, 133 So. 370.

21 citing documents.

State v. Green 493 So. 2d 1178 La. 1986
State v. Clay 441 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. White 153 So. 2d 401 La. 1963
State v. Jones 98 So. 2d 185 La. 1957
State v. Clark 93 So. 2d 13 La. 1957
State v. Poe 38 So. 2d 359 La. 1948
State v. Smith 33 So. 2d 664 La. 1947
State v. Dooley 23 So. 2d 46 La. 1945
State v. Barton 22 So. 2d 183 La. 1945
State v. White 20 So. 2d 10 La. 1944
State v. Kavanaugh 13 So. 2d 366 La. 1943
State v. Shuff 3 So. 2d 278 La. 1941
133 So.370, 374, "The scope and extent of the * * * statement is within the control of the trial fudge in the exercise of a wise discretion, and a conviction will not he set aside for error therein unless the rights of a defendant were plainly violated(Italics ours.)
State v. Smith 195 So. 523 La. 1940
State v. Sharbino 194 So. 756 La. 1940
State v. Tullos 182 So. 321 La. 1938
State v. Goodwin 179 So. 591 La. 1938
State v. Berryhill 177 So. 663 La. 1937
Except as otherwise provided herein, the judge must give every such requested charge that is wholly correct and wholly pertinent, unless the matter contained in such charge have been already given, or unless such charge require qualification, limitation or explanation.” , 133 So.
State v. Pace 165 So. 6 La. 1935
State v. Leahy 144 So. 138 La. 1932
99 , ; State v. Pellerin, 118 La.
State v. Terrell 144 So. 488 La. 1932
State v. Ducre 137 So. 745 La. 1931