Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lawrason v. Richard, 135 So. 29.

30 citing documents.

Christy Robinette v. Old Republic Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Robinette v. Old Republic Insurance Co. 229 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Adams v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford 543 So. 2d 480 La. 1989
Hutson v. Madison Parish Police Jury 496 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
McCoy v. Franklin Parish Police Jury 414 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Hicks v. Alphonse 294 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
1st Cir. 1973) quoting with approval on page 682, the following: " , 135 So.
Little v. Mississippi Chemical Express, Inc. 285 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Williams v. State Farm Insurance Company 273 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Bagley v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. of New York 216 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Beavers v. Butler 188 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Normand v. American Home Assurance Company 171 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
In Lawrason *810 v. Richard, , 135 So.
Carter v. Canal Insurance Co. 154 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Bordelon v. Couvillion 130 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Sumrall v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 124 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Insurance Co. 88 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Dickson v. Peters 87 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Hawkins v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 73 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
840 ; Lawrason v. Richard, 1931, , 135 So.
Hubble v. Bourg 68 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Waguespack v. Savarese 13 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1943
Russo v. Aucoin 7 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Kimbro v. Holladay 154 So. 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Richard v. Roquevert 148 So. 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
698 , ; this court held, to quote from the opinion on rehearing: “ ‘There is no joint adventure in the sense that the occupant of an automobile is equally liable with the driver unless there be also equal right to control the operation of the automobile,’ citing 42 C. J. 1179, § 957; Berry on Automobiles (6th Ed.) § 644
Monkhouse v. Johns 142 So. 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Reggie v. Karre 139 So. 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Delaune v. Breaux 139 So. 753 La. 1932
Pipes v. Gallman 140 So. 40 La. 1932
Lorance v. Smith 138 So. 871 La. 1931
Waters v. Meriwether Transfer Co. 137 So. 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
In the case cited above, a writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court “on the hypothesis that plaintiff and defendant were engaged in a joint enterprise, and that the acts of the one party were the acts of all, of which none could complain.” In recalling the writ and affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court said in , 135 So.
Chanson v. Morgan's L. & T. R. R. & S. S. Co. 136 So. 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Lawrason v. Owners' Automobile Ins. Co. of New Orleans 136 So. 57 La. 1931
See Lawrason v. Richard, ante, p. 696, .