Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sample v. Whitaker, 135 So. 38.

26 citing documents.

Ross v. La Coste De Monterville 502 So. 2d 1026 La. 1987
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson 312 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Bradford v. City of Shreveport 305 So. 2d 487 La. 1974
Brown v. Mayfield 92 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
Childs v. Washington 87 So. 2d 111 La. 1956
Cassiere v. Cuban Coffee Mills, Inc. 74 So. 2d 193 La. 1954
Elson v. Mathewes 69 So. 2d 734 La. 1953
Rigdon v. Holland 50 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Appellants cite Article 802 -728-729, 135 So.
Whitney Nat. Bank v. Little Creek Oil Co. 33 So. 2d 693 La. 1947
St. Martin Land Co. v. Pinckney 33 So. 2d 169 La. 1947
It is contended that the Legislature by Act No. 232 of 1944 has interpreted the holding in Vincent v. Bullock as applying the liberative prescription of ten years to a royalty right, , 135 So.
Union Sulphur Co. v. Lognion 26 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
To support their contention appellants rely largely on the following cases: , 135 So.
Allison v. Wideman 26 So. 2d 826 La. 1946
The case of Sample v. Whitaker, was a sequel of the case bearing the same title, reported in , 135 So.
Union Sulphur Co. v. Campbell 21 So. 2d 626 La. 1945
That article was declared applicable to a real obligation, consisting of the mineral rights held by two or more co-owners, imposed upon the land of another party, in the following cases: , 135 So.
Byrd v. Forgotson 34 So. 2d 777 La. 1945
Deas v. Lane 13 So. 2d 270 La. 1943
Spears v. Nesbitt 2 So. 2d 650 La. 1941
Ohio Oil Co. v. Cox 198 So. 902 La. 1940
Bradley v. Yancy 195 So. 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Dennig v. Whitworth 192 So. 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Munn v. Wadley 189 So. 561 La. 1939
State Ex Rel. Bourgaux v. Fontenot 187 So. 66 La. 1939
Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Hodge-Hunt Lumber Co. 181 So. 865 La. 1938
They rely on Article 802, Revised Civil Code, which reads, “If among the coproprietors there be one against whom prescription cart not run, as for instance a minor, he shall preserye the right of all the others.” , 135 So.
Ford v. Williams 179 So. 298 La. 1938
Patton's Heirs v. Moseley 173 So. 772 La. 1937
Defendants contend that such a circumstance is to be found in the minority of one of the four purchasers of the mineral rights from the Acme Land & Investment Company, Inc.; their contention being that, , 135 So.
Gayoso Co. v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation 145 So. 677 La. 1933
Sample v. Whitaker 140 So. 36 La. 1932
On November 20, 1911, during the lifetime of his wife, he sold said lands to one York Whitaker, Jr., , 135 So.