Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rester v. Moody & Stewart, 134 So. 690.

27 citing documents.

Pierce Foundations, Inc. v. Jaroy Construction, Inc. 190 So. 3d 298 La. 2016
206 (1935); and Rester v. Moody & Stewart, So.
Patriot Contstruction & Equipment,llc v. Rage Logistics, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
206 (1935); and Rester v. Moody & Stewart, So.
Patriot Construction & Equipment, LLC v. Rage Logistics, LLC 215 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
206 (1935); and Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Pierce Foundations, Inc. v. Jaroy Construction, Inc. 169 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
206 (La.1935); Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Word of Life Christian Center v. West 936 So. 2d 1226 La. 2006
art. 11; Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
State v. McInnis Bros. Const. 701 So. 2d 937 La. 1997
206 (1935); and Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
US Pollution Control, Inc. v. NAT. AMERICAN INS. 663 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Wilkin v. Dev Con Builders, Inc. 561 So. 2d 66 La. 1990
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
JAVELER CONST. CO., INC. v. Federal Ins. Co. 472 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, So.
Coating Specialists, Inc. v. Pat Caffey Contractor, Inc. 194 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Waldrip Tire & Supply Co. v. Campbell Construction Co. 158 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In this regard, it may be noted that the Supreme Court specifically pointed out, in Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Martinolich v. Albert 143 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Rester v. Moody & Stewart et al., , 134 So.
B. & G. Crane Service, Inc. v. Anderson Bros. Corp. 132 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Rester v. Moody & Stewart et al., , 134 So.
Town of Eunice v. Trinity Universal Insurance 123 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
And, although Section 8 of Act 41 of 1894 did indeed permit suit against the corporate surety on the bond in the same jurisdiction as the principal, see Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Burge v. ADMINISTRATOR, ETC. 83 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Burge v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor 83 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Liller v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 59 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1952
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Hughes v. Will 35 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1948
Rester v. Moody Stewart, supra [ , 134 So.
Idom v. Moss 32 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
470, 472 ; Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Southport Petroleum Co. v. Fithian 13 So. 2d 382 La. 1943
470, 472 ; Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Terrebonne Lumber Supply Co. v. Favret 2 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain 1 So. 2d 545 La. 1941
Rester v. Moody & Stewart et al., , 134 So.
Maddry v. Moore Bros. Lumber Co. 197 So. 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Rester v. Moody & Stewart et al., , 134 So.
Surgan v. Parker 181 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Klotz v. Tru-Fruit Distributors 173 So. 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
In matters relative to partnership, as long as the partnership continues, in all suits concerning it the parties must be cited to appear before the tribunal of the place where it is established, or if there are several establishments, before that of the place where the obligation was entered into.” Our Supreme Court, in Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Anderson v. Harvey & Jones 154 So. 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
In contesting plaintiff’s right to a lien, defendant relies on the following cases: Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.
Green v. Hawkins & Antoon 144 So. 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
miciled elsewhere, it and the present defendants might have been sued jointly there.” Continuing, the court said: “Thus our law of procedure specifically requires that suits of the present character must be brought either at the domicile of the partnership, or, if it has two or more places of business, at the place where the obligation was entered into.” The case of Rester v. Moody & Stewart, , 134 So.