DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., 141 So. 38.

31 citing documents.

  • Meaghan Frances Hardcastle v. De Paris 917 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, 1932, , 141 So.
  • Abshire v. Vermilion Parish School Bd. 848 So. 2d 552 La. 2003
    Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, 1932, , 141 So.
  • Creely v. Leisure Living, Inc. 437 So. 2d 816 La. 1983
  • Williams v. Bel 339 So. 2d 748 La. 1976
    In Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Cramer v. Guercio 331 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Adams v. Adams 283 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Boisseau v. Vallon and Jordano, Inc., et al., , 141 So.
  • Pierre v. Chevalier 233 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    477 , S (1951); Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Landry & Passman Realty, Inc. v. Keen 170 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    366 ; Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Steckler v. Continental Oil Co. 154 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Molero v. California Company 145 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Dupre v. Dupre 72 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    122 ; Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Walker v. Moore 68 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    One of the points urged by appellant in favor of the exception of no cause and no right of action is that this court should be governed by the decision in the case of Boisscau v. Vallon & Jordana, Inc., 1932, , 141 So.
  • C. J. Tessier, Inc. v. Wedderin 59 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    See also Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Cabral v. Barkerding 50 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1951
    The case falls within the provisions of Article 1945 of the Civil Code as interpreted in the case of Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, supra, ( , 141 So.
  • Blackshear v. Landey 46 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1950
    9 ; Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Donlon v. Babin 44 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    It cannot reasonably be said that a co-owner is `another party.'" Counsel cites in support of this reasoning Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • McKelvy v. Milford 37 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    527 ; Boisseau v. Vallon Jordano, Inc., et al., , 141 So.
  • Weingart v. Delgado 16 So. 2d 254 La. 1943
    316 ; Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Dockson Gas Co. v. S. W. Const. Co. 12 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    Also see Boisseau v. Vallon Jordano, Inc., et al., , 141 So.
  • Leaman v. Rauschkolb 1 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    The opinion in Mathews Bros. v. Bernius, supra, so far as we are able to discern, has never been overruled but it is apt to remark that, in a later case, viz: , 141 So.
  • Leaman v. Rauschkolb. 199 So. 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    First, he asserts that a proper interpretation of the contract will show that it was not the intention of the parties that a commission should be paid unless the transfer should be completed, and he cites Boisaeau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
    122 ; Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co. 189 So. 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    r provides thát Mrs. Richardson is liable for the fee of the real estate agent whether or not this contract is annulled, and while it is also true that the prospective vendor, Mrs. Murphy, by the terms of the acceptance, is also made liable for the payment of the commission, that feature of this type of contract has been frowned upon by the Supreme Court in Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Reimann v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 187 So. 30 La. 1939
    178 , and Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Vincent v. Bullock 187 So. 35 La. 1939
    See, also, Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Rossignol v. Morgan & Jacobs, Inc. 185 So. 883 La. 1939
    In the case of Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.
  • Guy L. Deano, Inc. v. Michel 185 So. 9 La. 1938
    * * * ” Defendant, on the other hand, relies on the case of Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Guy L. Deano, Inc. v. Michel 181 So. 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    On behalf of defendant it is contended, on the other hand, that the rule recognized in the Bernius Case and for so long followed prior thereto has been almost completely abrogated in later cases (citing Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Spiro v. Corliss 174 So. 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    Counsel for defendant calls attention to the decision of the Supreme Court in Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Spiro v. Corpora 174 So. 145 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1937
    And further that “The commission is earned on the signing of this agreement and shall not be affected by any subsequent agreement of the parties hereto, or by the annullment of this contract by any court.” The same contention, as is made by the plaintiff in this case, was invoked by the defendant realtors in the case of Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc., , 141 So.
  • Boisseau v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. 149 So. 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    e of the real estate, reading as follows: “The commission is earned on the signing of this agreement and shall not be affected by any subsequent agreement of the parties hereto, or by the annulment of this contract by any court.” The district court decided the provision referred to be against public policy and void, and the case was appealed to thp Supreme Court (Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, , 141 So.