Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co., 40 So. 2d 761.

21 citing documents.

Legros v. Norcen Exploration, Inc. 583 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
whenever the work done by the employee is essential to the principal's business", (La.App.
Legros v. Norcen Exploration, Inc. 583 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
whenever the work done by the employee is essential to the principal’s business”, (La.App.
Traylor v. Shell Oil Co. 400 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
23:1061, 23:1101, 23:1032; Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Co. et al., La.App., , affirmed 218 La.
Wofford v. Dow Chemical Co. 335 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
23:1061, 23:1101, 23:1032; Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Co. et al., La.App., , affirmed 218 La.
McBeth v. Salvation Army 314 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
[5] Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co., La.App., , aff'd.
LeBlanc v. Argonaut Southwest Insurance 258 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Frey v. Brown 254 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Moak v. Link-Belt Company 229 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Allen v. United States Fire Insurance Company 222 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
Beard v. Wilson Wholesale Distributors, Inc. 215 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Company, La.App., , affirmed 218 La.
Goodwin v. United States Rubber Company 186 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
This is in line with Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Company, La.App., ; 218 La.
Sanderson v. Binnings Construction Company 172 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co., La.App., ; Dandridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, La.App., 192 So.
Hatten v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. 112 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, Inc., La.App., ; Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co., La.App., ; Hebert v. Gates, La.App., 50 So.
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co. 110 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
887, 891 ; Thibodeaux v. Sun Oil Company, La.App., 765 , affirmed 218 La.
Richard v. National Surety Corporation 99 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
However, practically the same allegation was made in the case of Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Company, La.App., , and this court stated with regard to such an allegation and also in holding that the exclusive remedy of the plaintiff under the workmen's compensation laws of the State of Louisiana that: "Regardless of the fact that well pleaded facts for the purpose of considering exceptions of no right and of no cause of ac
Stansbury v. Magnolia Petroleum Company 91 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Mrs. Thibodaux then appealed to this Court and in our decision we reported in, La.App., , as follows: "Regardless of the fact that well pleaded facts for the purpose of considering exceptions of no right and of no cause of action are to be considered as true yet the conclusions of the pleader are not to be so considered and do not take the place of facts.
Coal Operators Cas. Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 66 So. 2d 852 La. 1953
Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co. 53 So. 2d 137 La. 1951
Sections 6, 7, and 34, Act 20 of 1914, as amended, LSA-RS 23:1061, 23:1101, 23:1032; Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Co. et al., La.App., , affirmed 218 La.
Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co. 49 So. 2d 852 La. 1950
Baker v. J. C. Chance Well Service 40 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., , the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Baker v. Sun Oil Co. 40 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., , the judgment appealed from is affirmed.