Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wirth v. Albert, 141 So. 1.

16 citing documents.

Sharkey's Reef, Ltd. v. Polit 688 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Korson v. Independence Mall I, Ltd. 595 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Canter v. Koehring Company 283 So. 2d 716 La. 1973
182 (1936), where the observance is made by way of dicta, since the manager-agent was held liable for an "actual commission" of a wrong, , 141 So.
Johnson v. Schneider 271 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Co., La.App., ; La Parie v. Totora, La.App., ; , 141 So.
Dever v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 266 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In this regard we are referred to the following cases: , 141 So.
Maxey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 255 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Johnson v. Continental Insurance 216 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
However, this Court in Daigle v. Cobb, La.App., , , 141 So.
Boudreaux v. Falco 215 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Daigle v. Cobb 175 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
In stating the liability of an officer to a third-person or a fellow-employee would result from "misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance" , 141 So.
Adams v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 107 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Corporations § 846, p. 274; Wirth v. Albert, 1932, , 141 So.
McGuire v. Louisiana Baptist Encampment, Inc. 199 So. 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
See 19 C.J.S., Corporations, p. 271, §§ 845 and 846; , 141 So.
Chelsea Sales Corp. v. A. Jacobs Co. 193 So. 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Stock v. E. A. Fabacher, Inc. 185 So. 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Bacher v. Albert 156 So. 191 La. 1934
Appellant’s case is identical with the case of Wirth v. Albert, decided by this court in , 141 So.
Wirth v. Albert 141 So. 5 La. 1932
1 this day decided; and, except as to the parties plaintiff, the amount involved, and the numbers of the interim certificates, the cases are identical.
Bacher v. Albert 141 So. 5 La. 1932
1 this day decided; and, except as to the party plaintiff, the amount involved, and the numbers of the interim certificates, the cases are identical.