Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Simon v. Duet, 148 So. 250.
- Robin Poole v. Wendell E. Poole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Poole v. Poole 7 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Bonura v. Bonura
505 So. 2d 143
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Specifically, she seeks to define adultery as the act of sexual intercourse, , 148 So.
- Menge v. Menge 491 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
- RAYNE STATE BANK & TR. CO. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
-
Soileau v. Soileau
431 So. 2d 7
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
“Her husband’s adultery entitles petitioner to an immediate divorce from him.” Defendant argues that the above language is insufficient to state a cause of action for divorce on grounds of adultery, , 148 So.
- Mickens v. American Automobile Ins. 67 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
-
Rembert v. Robinson
65 So. 2d 805
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
Simon v. Duet, 1933, , 148 So.
-
Breaux v. Decuir
49 So. 2d 495
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Counsel cites the, , 148 So.
- Doll v. Dearie 41 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
- Norvell v. Aiavolasiti 33 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
- Perez v. Meraux 9 So. 2d 662 La. 1942
- Sanders v. M. Feitel House Wrecking Co. 180 So. 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
-
Wilson & Gandy, Inc. v. Cummings
150 So. 436
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
238 , the court reaffirmed the doctrine announced in earlier cases, , 148 So.