DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Patton v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., 147 So. 33.

14 citing documents.

  • Bart v. Wysocki 558 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • Texaco v. Newton & Rosa Smith Charitable Trust 471 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Collins v. Hunter Co. 128 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    763 , 766: “The rule of law that controls this case is that the exercise of the mineral rights, or servitude, on any part of one continuous tract of land upon which the servitude is imposed is considered an exercise of the right on the whole tract.” In Patton et al. v. Frost Lumber Industries et al., 1933, , 147 So.
  • Hodges v. Long-Bell Petroleum Company 121 So. 2d 831 La. 1960
  • Brown v. Mayfield 92 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
  • Childs v. Washington 87 So. 2d 111 La. 1956
  • Lenard v. Shell Oil Co. 29 So. 2d 844 La. 1947
  • Ohio Oil Co. v. Ferguson 34 So. 2d 746 La. 1946
    669 ; Patton et al. v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., et al., , 147 So.
  • Byrd v. Forgotson 34 So. 2d 777 La. 1945
  • Hodges v. Norton 8 So. 2d 618 La. 1942
    669; Patton v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., , 147 So.
  • Spears v. Nesbitt 2 So. 2d 650 La. 1941
    hall be developed and operated as one lease,” and the further stipulation that the drilling of a well on any part of the land therein covered “capable of producing oil and/ or gas in paying quantities, * * * shall he held to he a sufficient and reasonable development of the entire leased premises,” (Italics ours) citing as authority therefor Patton et al. v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., et al., , 147 So.
  • Levy v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Ltd. 194 So. 772 La. 1940
    669 , at page 670, this court said: “We are of opinion that the exercise upon any part of a continuous tract of land of a servitude extending over the whole tract preserved the servitude over the whole for the reason that there is but one servitude on the whole tract.” See, also, , 147 So.
  • Vincent v. Bullock 187 So. 35 La. 1939
    e. The next contention • urged by plaintiffs is that the lessee produced oil on one of the several tracts covered by the lease and, inasmuch as production on one tract was, by the terms of the lease, deemed to be development of the entire property, there was an interruption of prescription then accruing against their rights, , 147 So.
  • Connell v. Muslow Oil Co., Inc. 172 So. 763 La. 1937
    “We are therefore of opinion that defendant has preserved his rights as to section 31 but not as to the other land's in controversy.” , 147 So.