Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Houghton v. Hall, 148 So. 37.

96 citing documents.

Guilbeau v. Guilbeau 71 So. 2d 129 La. 1954
Higginbotham v. Anders 69 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
Lewis v. Clay 60 So. 2d 78 La. 1952
Succession of Le Jeune 59 So. 2d 446 La. 1952
t from her husband although not separated by judgment of court, her earnings when carrying on a business, trade, occupation or industry separate from her husband, actions for damages resulting from offenses and quasi offenses and the property purchased with all funds thus derived, .are her separate property.” *444 This provision, as amended, , 148 So.
Succession of Schnitter 56 So. 2d 563 La. 1951
Succession of Schnitter 56 So. 2d 563 La. 1951
Succession of Tullier 53 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Valence v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 50 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
476 ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., La.App., ; , 148 So.
Succession of Valdez 44 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1950
Hawthorne v. Hawthorne 39 So. 2d 338 La. 1949
Art. 2334, as amended; Art. 2404, as amended; , 148 So.
Funderburk v. Funderburk 38 So. 2d 502 La. 1949
Johnson v. Johnson 36 So. 2d 396 La. 1948
Ortego v. Morein 33 So. 2d 516 La. 1947
In support of the contention that the property in question belonged to the community of acquets and gains that existed between his mother and father, , 148 So.
Gaines v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. 32 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
St. Martin Parish Police Jury v. Iberville Parish Police Jury 33 So. 2d 671 La. 1947
Betz v. Riviere 29 So. 2d 465 La. 1947
Succession of Davis 21 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Howell v. Harris 18 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Lotz v. Citizens Bank Trust Co. 17 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Kientz v. Charles Dennery 17 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
That earnings of the wife, while living with the husband, fall into the community is no longer a , 148 So.
Charlton v. Bailey 12 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
The question as to the money received by her from her separate business and whether it formed part of her separate estate, or went into the community of acquets and gains between herself and her husband, , 148 So.
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Crigler 12 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1942
See Houghton v. Hall [ ], 148 So.
Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board 200 So. 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Diggins v. Salley & Ellis 199 So. 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Smith v. Brock 200 So. 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co. 198 So. 656 La. 1940
Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co. 198 So. 656 La. 1940
Overruled Buttitta v. Varino 197 So. 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Cox v. Caldwell. 197 So. 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Small v. McNeely 195 So. 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Burns v. Rivero 189 So. 129 La. 1939
above, recites that: “Our father- had retired some ten years before his death and our mother engaged in business on her own account; that the funds with which our mother purchased the property hereinabove described were acquired by her from the operation of her business and amounts contributed to her by us at various times and our father in no wise contributed to said funds.” , 148 So.
Drewett v. Carnahan 183 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
The law of Louisiana pertaining to this legal question, and to the manner of overcoming the presumption, , 148 So.
Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
Succession of Provost 181 So. 802 La. 1938
Vanzant v. Morgan 181 So. 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Civil Code, article 2402; , 148 So.
Michiels v. Succession of Gladden 180 So. 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Gremillion v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 172 So. 163 La. 1937
Guccione v. New Jersey Ins. Co. of Newark, N. J. 167 So. 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Treadwell v. Columbia Casualty Co. 167 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
State v. Bisso Realty & Investment Co. 167 So. 87 La. 1936
Byrd v. Babin 159 So. 718 La. 1935
Concordia Oil & Gas Co. v. Keenan 153 So. 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
It is admitted that the property in question was acquired in the name of Mrs. Merzie H. Keenan in 1924, át a time when she was married to J. E. Keenan, and that it was paid for with money earned by Mrs. Keenan ⅛ taking boarders, and in this coui-t intervener concedes, under authority of Houghton v. Hall, *551 , 148 So.
La Rose v. Alliance Casualty Co. 150 So. 455 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1933
Jackson State Nat. Bank v. Merchants' Bank & Trust Co. 149 So. 539 La. 1933
Charles Lob's Sons, Ltd. v. Karnofsky 148 So. 34 La. 1933
Succession of Howell 148 So. 48 La. 1933
We have before us a case, namely, , 148 So.