Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Quatray v. Wicker, 151 So. 208.

43 citing documents.

Cole v. Celotex Corp. 599 So. 2d 1058 La. 1992
Lebleu v. Southern Silica of Louisiana 554 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. 528 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Sellers v. Seligman 463 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Daniels v. Conn 382 So. 2d 945 La. 1980
2098, 2103, 2104 and 2324, [6] and Quatray *952 v. Wicker, , 151 So.
Thomas v. W & W CLARKLIFT, INC. 375 So. 2d 375 La. 1979
Ferguson v. Lankford 374 So. 2d 1205 La. 1979
Truxillo v. Gentilly Medical Building, Inc. 225 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
2091 and 2092 are present in the joint tort-feasors' obligations (at least after judgment, if only "imperfect" solidarity exists before); , 151 So.
Morris v. Kospelich 206 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc. 205 So. 2d 422 La. 1967
Morgan v. Taxicab Bonding Ass'n 204 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
art. 2103, as amended: , 151 So.
Danks v. Maher 177 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
450 ; Quatray v. Wicker [ , ] supra; Appalachian Corporation v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co., 151 La.
Vidrine v. General Fire and Casualty Company 168 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Harvey v. Travelers Insurance Company 163 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
1 Cir., ; Quatray v. Wicker, *919 , ; Cust v. Item Co., 200 La.
Johnson v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 163 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Jarrell v. Gordy 162 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Lanier v. TL James & Company 148 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company 142 So. 2d 796 La. 1962
Casualty Reciprocal Exch. v. RICHEY DRILL. & W. SERV. 137 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
[Citations omitted.]" , 151 So.
Peats v. Martin 133 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Gracianette v. Brown 131 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
See Auto Painting & Repairing Co., Inc. v. Ware, La.App., .
Haindel v. Sewerage & Water Board 115 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Rice v. Traders & General Insurance Company 114 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Johnson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 106 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Marquette Casualty Company v. Brown 103 So. 2d 269 La. 1958
Kahn v. Urania Lumber Company 103 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Abadie v. Loubat 97 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
May v. Cooperative Cab Co. 52 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Chavers v. AR Blossman, Inc. 45 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
De Cuers v. Crane Co. 40 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works 37 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Until July, 1933, , *Page 616 151 So.
Jones v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 35 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works 33 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Winford v. Bullock 26 So. 2d 822 La. 1946
Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. v. V-8 Cab Co. 18 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Roppolo v. Pick 4 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Gulf States U. Co. 4 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
The first part of the above rule, to the effect that joint tort-feasors whose negligence combines in causing damage to a third person cannot enforce contribution between or among themselves, does not prevail in Louisiana, , 151 So.
Reid v. Lowden 189 So. 286 La. 1939
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. De Jean 171 So. 450 La. 1936
Had Sandoz done so, then the solidary liability of both defendants would have been fixed by a judgment of court, and, under article 2103 of the Civil Code, , 151 So.
&198tna Life Ins. Co. v. Dejean 167 So. 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
If Sandoz had also sued Dejean and had secured a judgment against him in solido with Beridon, then the solidary liability of both would have been fixed by 'judgment of court, and under article 2103 of the Civil Code, , 151 So.
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. De Jean 164 So. 331 La. 1935
Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Co. 161 So. 191 La. 1935
Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Bowdon 159 So. 394 La. 1935
*302 In the argument at bar, counsel for both •sides stated that they were of the opinion that this court had jurisdiction, and referred - , 151 So.