Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Officer v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co., 143 So. 500.
- Fed. Nat. Mortg. v. Prudential Property 517 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Bohn v. La. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. 482 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Rushing v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 456 So. 2d 599 La. 1984
- May v. Market Ins. Co. 387 So. 2d 1081 La. 1980
- Diaz v. Cherokee Insurance Company 275 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
- Lott & Sons, Inc. v. Strahan 236 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Girard v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance 198 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Carlisle v. American Automobile Insurance 86 So. 2d 683 La. 1956
-
McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co.
80 So. 2d 405
La. 1955
In the case of Officer v. American Eagle Fire & Insurance Company, , 143 So.
- Commercial Securities Co. v. Central Sur. Ins. 29 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Branch v. Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co. 4 So. 2d 806 La. 1941
- Eicher-Woodland Co. v. Buffalo Ins. Co. 3 So. 2d 268 La. 1941
- Randazzo v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania 200 So. 267 La. 1941
- First Nat. Bank in Mansfield v. Hartford Fire Ins. 195 So. 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
- Wray-Dickinson Co. v. Commercial Credit Co. 192 So. 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
Dutton v. Harmonia Ins. Co. of Buffalo, N.Y.
184 So. 546
La. 1938
Defendant contends that the homestead, as mortgagee, had separate and distinct insurance protection to the extent of its interest in the property and was brought into the relation of “privy” with the insurer, by virtue of the Standard Mortgage or Union Mortgage Clause of the policy, , 143 So.
- Canal Savings & Homestead Ass'n v. Harmonia Ins. Co. of Buffalo 181 So. 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Hammett v. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia 157 So. 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- In Re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg. Co. 151 So. 212 La. 1933
- Brooks v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. 144 So. 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932