Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Knowles v. Dixie Fire Ins. Co. of Greensboro, N.C., 149 So. 528.

21 citing documents.

Rodriguez v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. 358 So. 2d 1237 La. 1978
Co. of Greensboro, N. G., , 149 So.
Rodriguez v. Northwestern National Insurance 347 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Co. of Greensboro, N. C., , 149 So.
Carroll v. American Employers Insurance Co. 241 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Co. of Greensboro, N. C, , 149 So.
Schulz v. United States Fire Insurance 218 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Co. of Greensboro, N. C., , 149 So.
Frazier v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. 211 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Co. of Greensboro, N. C., , 149 So.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Clair 193 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Co. of Greensboro, N.C., , 149 So.
Rigdon v. Marquette Casualty Company 163 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
In Knowles v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company of Greensboro, North Carolina, , 149 So.
Gibson's Tri-state Wholesale, Inc. v. Scottish Union & National Insurance 149 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
o the making and preserving of an itemized inventory is a part of the iron-safe clause, which is material in ascertaining the loss in the event of fire, it follows that the foregoing authorities are pertinent to show that the failure to-make and preserve the inventory, insubstantial accord with the clause, is *128 fatal to the right to recover on the policy.’ “ , 149 So.
Welch v. New York Underwriters Insurance Co. 145 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Co. of Greensboro, N. C., , 149 So.
Lee v. Travelers Fire Ins. Co. 53 So. 2d 692 La. 1951
In Knowles v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company of Greensboro, North Carolina, , 149 So.
Lee v. Travelers Fire Ins. 44 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Act No. 222 of 1928; Knowles v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company of Greensboro, N.C., , 149 So.
Donlon v. Babin 44 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
708 , and Knowles v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company of Greensboro, North Carolina, , 149 So.
Sims v. Nat. Casualty Co. 43 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
708 , and Knowles v. Dixie Fire Insurance Co. of Greensboro, North Carolina, , 149 So.
Prilleux v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 4 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Plaintiff also contends that, , 149 So.
First Nat. Bank in Mansfield v. Hartford Fire Ins. 195 So. 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Rayford v. &198tna Ins. Co. 193 So. 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Rickerfor v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. 186 So. 109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1939
Terwilliger v. Union Fire, Accident & General Ins. 185 So. 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Brough v. Presidential Fire Marine Ins. Co. 181 So. 432 La. 1938
Co. of Greensboro, N.C., , 149 So.
Brough v. Presidential Fire Marine Ins. Co. 176 So. 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
In Louisiana is found a case in which, very evidently, the contention made here was not presented, but in which the facts raised the exact question of law, though neither counsel referred to it; , 149 So.
Breland v. Great States Ins. Co. 160 So. 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935