Hilliard v. Shuff
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 2, 1968 216 So. 2d 405; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., February 17, 1950 44 So. 2d 517; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 28, 1928 121 So. 217; La., March 15, 1871 23 La. Ann. 194
Hilliard v. Shuff, 241 So. 2d 56 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970).
Cited by
- Hilliard v. Shuff 285 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Hilliard v. Shuff 280 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Opinion text
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING En Banc. Rehearing Denied. HOOD, J., is of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted. MILLER, Judge. The dissent by Judge Hood raised persuasive issues, but the record does not show that the trial court committed manifest error. Plaintiff did not complain when these tanks were erected. Plaintiff did not testify that these tanks interfered with his use of his property. He did testify that his son did not want to build next to plaintiff’s home, but his son did not give a reason for this decision. The application for rehearing is properly denied.