Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Anderson, 145 So. 270.

24 citing documents.

State v. Stringer 567 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Succession of Rodgers 499 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Cormier v. Cormier 479 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Succession of City v. Succession of Manuel 469 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Distinguished Juneau v. Alexander 446 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
IMC Exploration Co. v. Henderson 419 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Succession of Fuselier 325 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Succession of Milton 278 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Succession of Theriot 185 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Succession of Israel 146 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Goins v. Gates 93 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Succession of White 85 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1956
Dazio v. Wainwright 81 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
A. No, I’ve seen them too, when I was a kid.” *99 The opinion of the judge a quo recites: “Counsel for plaintiffs, in his brief, contends that all of the evidence tendered was admissible under the exception to the hearsay .rule, citing as authority David v. Sittig, 1 Mart.,N.S., 147, Succession of Anderson [ ], 145 So.
Succession of Gaines 79 So. 2d 322 La. 1955
Succession of St. Amand 65 So. 2d 780 La. 1953
Allen v. Anderson 55 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1951
Patin v. T. L. James Co. 42 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Cameron v. Rowland 23 So. 2d 283 La. 1945
Cameron v. Rowland. 23 So. 2d 285 La. 1945
In Re Gray's Succession 9 So. 2d 481 La. 1942
Succession of Tyson 172 So. 772 La. 1937
Succession of Anderson 157 So. 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Trotter v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 146 So. 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
In that case we have reviewed at considerable length the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court on this important question, and followed the most recent decision of that court on the subject, that of .
Duty v. Fowler Commission Co., Inc. 146 So. 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
The latest decision of the Supreme Court on these questions is that of .