DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Haas Land Co., 153 So. 6.

17 citing documents.

  • State, Through Dept. of Highways v. Champagne 371 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Haas Land Co., Ltd., , 153 So.
  • Istre v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 329 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    ****** “Under this uniform jurisprudence, the unopposed appropriation for a public purpose is regarded as creating a servitude (limited to the nature and extent of use conferred by such mere occupancy, Consolidated Companies, , 153 So.
  • Adams v. Spillman 290 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Veillon v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company 192 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    Under this uniform jurisprudence, the unopposed appropriation for a public purpose is regarded as creating a servitude (limited to the nature and extent of use conferred by such mere occupancy, Consolidated Companies, , 153 So.
  • Acadia-Vermilion Rice Irrigating Co. v. Broussard 185 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    NOTES [1] Consolidated Companies, , 153 So.
  • Sagrera v. Mouton 180 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    2 Cir., ; and Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Haas Land Co., Ltd., et al, , 153 So.
  • Michael v. State 129 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    The above article was similarly construed in Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Haas Land Company, Ltd., 1934, , 153 So.
  • Ryan v. Laprairie 84 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1956
    899 , ; Consolidated Companies, Inc., v. Haas Land Co., , 153 So.
  • Wiggs v. Warren Realty Co. 84 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1956
    73 ; Consolidated Companies, Inc., v. Haas Land Co., , 153 So.
  • Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Dileo 79 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    and implied ratification by the landowners has acquired a servitude permitting it to place its lines at their present location 6 feet west of the paved edge of the present highway; but the Company's servitude at this present location close to the highway is based on mere occupancy and is limited to the land actually used by the Company there, Consolidated Companies, Inc., v. Haas Land Co., Ltd., , 153 So.
  • Carlisle v. Graves 64 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    887 ; Consolidated Companies, Inc., v. Haas Land Co., Ltd., , 153 So.
  • Succession of Bryant 53 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    In Consolidated Companies, Inc., v. Haas Land Co., Limited, , 153 So.
  • Aucoin v. Marcel 38 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    "Seldom do we find cases which are so clearly analogous as is the instant case to that of Consolidated Co[mpanies] v. Haas Land Co., , 153 So.
  • Fitzgerald v. Hyland 6 So. 2d 321 La. 1942
  • Walters v. Reliance Industrial Life Ins. 180 So. 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
  • Harrison v. Butler 167 So. 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    “Sale in which specific boundaries are given is a ‘sale per aver-sionem,’ and conveys all land within boundaries given, whether measure be correctly stated in deed or not, as designation of boundaries control enumeration of quantity.” Consolidated Companies, , 153 So.
  • Landeche Bros. Co. v. Levert 155 So. 771 La. 1934
    The rule that a description by metes and bounds prevails over other means of description is definitely reiterated in the opinion of this court, on rehearing, in the case of Consolidated Companies, Inc., v. Haas Land Co., Limited et al., , 153 So.