Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Oakes v. Walther, 154 So. 26.
- Molaison v. Lukinovich 142 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Bernberg v. Strauss
999 So. 2d 1184
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Marrogi v. Howard, 01-1106, p. 8 (La.1/15/02), , , 154 So.
- Zuber v. Buie 849 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
American LifeCare, Inc. v. Wood
826 So. 2d 646
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Marrogi v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.1/15/02), , , 154 So.
- Marrogi v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1118 La. 2002
- Genovese v. Usner 602 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Freeman v. Cooper 390 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Adserv Corp. v. Lincecum 385 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Calvert v. Simon 311 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
- Mertz v. Sauvageau 154 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
- Miller, Smith and Champagne v. Capital City Press 142 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
Simms v. Clark
194 So. 123
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
principal defense seems to be that the letter was written by the defendant to the principal of the school concerning the welfare of a pupil in whom both the writer and the principal had a mutual interest, and for that reason the letter was not published to the world but was a qualified privileged communication, made in good faith, and, , 154 So.
- State v. Lambert 178 So. 508 La. 1938
- Walsh v. Bertel 175 So. 605 La. 1937
- Johnson v. Crow 158 So. 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935