Elliott Electric Co. v. Clark & Melat Drilling Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 2, 1970 240 So. 2d 432; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 28, 1950 45 So. 2d 209; La., March 15, 1871 23 La. Ann. 284
Elliott Electric Co. v. Clark & Melat Drilling Co., 133 So. 530 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Williams v. Gilkeson-Sloss Commission Co. 45 La. Ann. 1013
- 13 So. 394 not in our corpus
- First National Bank v. Johnson 130 La. 288
Opinion text
WEBB, J. Plaintiff proceeded against defendant, a non-resident, by attachment, under which property belonging to the defendant was seized and bonded by defendant under the provisions of article 259, Code of Practice; and thereafter judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff on default, from which judgment defendant appealed. Appellant has not made any appearance here, and we do not know what was the basis of the appeal; that is, whether defendant claims there was a defect in the citation and seizure of the property, or that the evidence was insufficient to establish the debt claimed. As stated, however, defendant bonded the property attached, and thereby cured any informality in the service of citation and submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the court (Williams v. Gilkeson-Sloss Commission Co., 45 La. Ann. 1013 , 13 So. 394 ; First National Bank v. Johnson, 130 La. 288 , 57 So. 930 ), and, from our review of the evidence presented on trial of the cause, we find that the debt claimed against defendant was established. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.