Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., 149 So. 434.

55 citing documents.

Suire v. Union Sulphur Co. 155 So. 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
His conclusion was that the National Industrial Recovery Act and the Code of Fair Competition for the Petroleum Industry had not made any change in the Employers’ Liability Act, under which the daily rate of pay based on a 6-day week was the intendment of the act, as held in Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., , 149 So.
Gonsoulin v. Lake Charles Stevedores, Inc. 153 So. 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1934
The plaintiff contends that the decision of this court heretofore rendered is contrary to the decision of the Supreme Court in Rylander v. T. Smith & Sons, Inc., , 149 So.
Durrett v. Unemployment Relief Committee 152 So. 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
In support of his contention, counsel cites the case of Rylander v. T., Smith & Son, , 149 So.
Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co. 151 So. 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
In the latest and controlling case on this subject, that of Rylander v. T. Smith & Sons, , 149 So.
Barker v. Ouachita Ice & Utilities Co. 151 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
1928, is now dissipated by the decision of our Supreme Court in the case of Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., , 149 So.