Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Co., 149 So. 496.

33 citing documents.

Marlon Eaglin v. Eunice Police Department La. 2018
Marlon Eaglin v. Eunice Police Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
In De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Construction, Inc., 149 So.
Eaglin v. Eunice Police Department 228 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Co., Inc., , 149 So.
Killian v. Irving 34 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Williams v. New Orleans Police Department 24 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Id., citing DeBouchel v. Koss Const. Co., Inc., (La.
Jackson v. JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT 993 So. 2d 219 La. 2008
Matthews v. City of Bossier City 963 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
As noted by this court in Hampton v. Kroger Company, 27,073 (La.App.2d Cir.06/21/95), , writ denied, 95-2140 (La.01/05/96), , , 149 So.
Richard J. Murray, Jr., Et Ux. v. Town of Mansura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Murray v. Town of Mansura 940 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Kelly v. West Cash & Carry Bldg. Materials 745 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
DeBouchel v. Koss Const. Co., Inc., , 149 So.
Winn v. City of Alexandria 685 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
DeBouchel v. Koss Const. Co., Inc., , 149 So.
Hampton v. Kroger Co. 658 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
To the contrary, , 149 So.
Fisher v. Dept. of Public Safety 555 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Ross v. Sheriff of Lafourche Parish 479 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
O'CONNER v. Hammond Police Dept. 439 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Kyle v. City of New Orleans 353 So. 2d 969 La. 1977
210 , (1952); De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Co., Inc., , 149 So.
Cerna v. Rhodes 341 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Conques v. Fuselier 327 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Meyers v. Edwards 256 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Tillman v. Holsum Bakeries, Inc. 244 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Hayes v. Muller 243 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Co. v. United States Rubber Co. 245 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., supra; De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Co., Inc., et al., , 149 So.
Nettles v. Great American Insurance Company 155 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
234 ]; De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Co., Inc., et al., , 149 So.
Ensminger v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. 134 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
The decision rested upon the authority of De Bouchel v. Koss Construction Company, Inc. et al., 1933, , 149 So.
Wells v. Gaspard 129 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
15:59, 15:60 (1)); and that in an action for damages by reason of false arrest, since the sole question is whether the detention is under color of legal authority (De Bouchel v. *246 Koss Const. Co., , 149 So.
Cox v. Cashio 96 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
There is a marked distinction between the two causes of actionin false imprisonment, the detention is "without color of legal authority", whereas in malicious prosecution, any detention "is malicious but under the due forms of law", , 149 So.
Barfield v. Marron 62 So. 2d 276 La. 1952
Barrios v. Yoars 184 So. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
The distinction between a malicious prosecution and a , 149 So.
Callender v. Marks 171 So. 86 La. 1936
Callender v. Marks 166 So. 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co. 165 So. 632 La. 1936
And, if this be not true, the plea of prescription of one year must be sustained, because, if neither the demand nor the cause of action is the same, the filing of the first- suit would not have the effect of interrupting the prescription of one year under article 3536 of the Revised Civil Code, and they cited the case of De Bouchel v. Koss Construction Co. , 149 So.
Chennault v. Stovall 160 So. 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
De Bouchel v. Koss Const Co. 157 So. 270 La. 1934

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by