Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of La Barre, 153 So. 15.

40 citing documents.

Succession of Laurie Maria Brocato . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 1/14/98), ( 153 So.
Succession of Cladie J. Wade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Succession Of Dean Allen Bradley La. 2022
1976) (quoting from 153 So.
Succession of Cladie J. Wade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Noting the strong public policy of sustaining the validity of wills and giving effect to the testator’s wishes when possible ( 153 So.
In re Perritt 253 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Succession of La Barre , , 153 So.
Succession of Russell Leavines La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
“Where it is a question of the choice between two interpretations, one of which will effectuate, and the other will defeat, a testator’s intention, the court will carry out the intention of the testator.” ( 153 So.
Succession of Leavines 215 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“Where it is a question of the choice between two interpretations, one of which will effectuate, and the other will defeat, a testator’s intention, the court will carry out the intention of the testator.” ( , 153 So.
Succession of Henderson 191 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Succession of Attward Joseph Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
“Where it is a question of the choice between two interpretations, one of which will effectuate, and the other will defeat, a testator’s intention, the court will carry out the intention of the testator.” ( 153 So.
Succession Soileau 918 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
“Where it is a question of the choice between two interpretations, one of which will effectuate, and the other will defeat, a testator’s intention, the court will carry out the intention of the testator.” ( , 153 So.
In Re Succession of Helms 810 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Succession of Davis 799 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In re the Succession of Hornsby 673 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Succession of Russell 590 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Adams v. Taylor 552 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Succession of LeBarre, [ ] 153 So 15 (La.1934), Succession of Blaum, [ 236 La.
Succession of Wagner 431 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Where it is a question of the choice between two interpretations, one of which will effectuate, and the other will defeat, a testator’s intention, the court should select that interpretation which will carry out the intention of the testator.” , 153 So.
Succession of Raiford 393 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In re the Succession of Reeves 393 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Carter v. Succession of Carter, La., (1976); , 153 So.
In RE SUCCESSIONS OF JOHNSON v. Williams 387 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Succession of Jones 377 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Matter of Succession of Jones 369 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In re the Succession of Baskin 349 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Article 1712, above; Succession of Carter, above; , 153 So.
Carter v. Succession of Carter 332 So. 2d 439 La. 1976
Succession of Franz 329 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Succession of Boyd 306 So. 2d 687 La. 1975
The strong public policy of the State, sustaining the validity of wills and giving effect to the testator's wishes when possible ( , 153 So.
Succession of Waterman 298 So. 2d 731 La. 1974
Succession of Martin 262 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Succession of Barnett 245 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Succession of Barry 196 So. 2d 265 La. 1967
Succession of Hammett 183 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Succession of Jones 172 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Succession of Shows 158 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Oroszy v. Burkard 158 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Succession of Formby 127 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Succession of Thibodeaux 116 So. 2d 525 La. 1959
Succession of Elliott 111 So. 2d 344 La. 1959
Succession of Blaum 110 So. 2d 95 La. 1959
Succession of Kamlade 94 So. 2d 257 La. 1957
Succession of Lambert 28 So. 2d 1 La. 1946
Succession of Price 13 So. 2d 240 La. 1943