DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Di Carlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, 152 So. 327.

16 citing documents.

  • Coulon v. Witco Corp. 848 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    729 , DiCarlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. Entergy Corp. 804 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Crump v. Sabine River Authority 737 So. 2d 720 La. 1999
    In Di Carlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Explained Stewart v. Parish of Jefferson 668 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5th Cir. 9/27/94); , 1304 we explained: In DiCarlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Bledsoe v. Willowdale Country Club 643 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    In DiCarlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
    Addison on Torts, p. 1163.'" DiCarlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 418 So. 2d 531 La. 1982
    See Di Carlo v. Landry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Wilson v. Hartzman 373 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    502 , (1968); Devoke v. Yazoo & DiCarlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Derbofen v. TL James & Co., Inc. 355 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    [5] DiCarlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Craig v. Montelepre Realty Co. 211 So. 2d 627 La. 1968
    part of their damages was suffered during the preceding *515 year, as contended by defendant, since the burden rests upon the party pleading prescription 'to show what portion of the damages proved occurred anterior to the year preceding the institution of the suit or in other words, to prove what part of the plaintiff's demand is prescribed.’ * * * Di Carlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Hobson v. Walker 41 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    v. Laundry Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Kellogg v. Mertens 30 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • Devoke v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co. 30 So. 2d 816 La. 1947
    641 ; Di Carlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Henderson v. Marmande 177 So. 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co. 165 So. 632 La. 1936
    See, also, Di Carlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.
  • Meyer v. Kemper Ice Co. 158 So. 378 La. 1934
    In the recent ease of DiCarlo v. Laundry & Dry Cleaning Service, , 152 So.