DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 151 So. 193.

13 citing documents.

  • Santiago v. Tulane University Hospital & Clinic 115 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Similarly the Court stated in Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., , 151 So.
  • Moore v. Gencorp, Inc. 633 So. 2d 1268 La. 1994
    1st Cir.1984), citing Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, , 151 So.
  • Thibaut v. Thibaut 607 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, , 151 So.
  • Keller v. Townsley 462 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, , 151 So.
  • Morris v. Williams 88 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    iling of the dilatory exception, rather than the answer, for purposes of deciding whether petitions could be freely amended or on the other hand “after issue joined” only “with the leave of the court * * * provided the amendment does not alter the substance of his demand”, Article 419, C.P.; see Comment, supra cit., 1 La.Law Review 174 at 178—179; see Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., , 151 So.
  • American Insurance v. Mr. Fog, Inc. 81 So. 2d 429 La. 1955
    324 ; Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., , 151 So.
  • Seale v. Stephens 29 So. 2d 65 La. 1946
    In the case of Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., , 151 So.
  • Diamond T. Motor Trucks v. Heck 13 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    On the other hand, in Self v. Great Atlantic § Pacific Tea Co., , 151 So.
  • Martin-Owsley, Inc. v. Philip Freitag, Inc. 12 So. 2d 270 La. 1943
    Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., , 151 So.
  • Levin v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. 2 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    In Self v. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company, 1933, , 151 So.
  • Burglass v. Burglass 193 So. 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    182 ; Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, , 151 So.
  • Searcy v. Novo 188 So. 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    581 ; Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, , 151 So.
  • Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York 168 So. 488 La. 1936
    182 ; Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., , 151 So.