Great Southern Lumber Co. v. James Stanton Const. Co.
Great Southern Lumber Co. v. James Stanton Const. Co., 151 So. 66 (La. 1933).
Cited by
- Lerner v. Bischof 189 So. 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Vallee v. Hunsberry 108 La. 136
- 32 So. 359 not in our corpus
- Sammons v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 143 La. 731
- Lafayette v. Farr 162 La. 385
- Doiron v. Vacuum Oil Co. 165 La. 563
- Wiley v. Ballio & Perry 171 La. 411
Opinion text
O’NIELL, Chief Justice (concurring). In Vallee v. Hunsberry, 108 La. 136 , 32 So. 359 , 360, it was held that a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground “that the transcript fails to show any order of appeal from the only final judgment ‘read and signed’ ” came too late, because it was filed after the lapse of three days; but, in the following cases, the doctrine of Gagneaux v. Desonier was affirmed, viz.: Sammons v. New Orleans Railway & Light Company, 143 La. 731 , 79 So. 320 ; Lafayette v. Farr, 162 La. 385 , 110 So. 624 ; Doiron v. Vacuum Oil Company, 165 La. 563 , 115 So. 752 ; Wiley v. Ballio & Perry, 171 La. 411 , 131 So. 192 . Act No. 234 of 1932, p. 739, forbidding the appellate courts to dismiss appeals for certain causes, appears to be not applicable to this case. For these reasons I concur in the decree dismissing this appeal.