Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co., 152 So. 578.

16 citing documents.

First National Bank of Commerce v. Breaux 529 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In re Canal Bank & Trust Co., Intervention of Wainer, , 152 So.
Wainer v. Wainer 26 So. 2d 829 La. 1946
Appellant’s sixth ground of complaint is that the cash in the Canal Bank & Trust Company in liquidation, appraised at $2100, due to defendant by that bank, cannot be computed by reference to the case of In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co., Intervention of Wainer, , 152 So.
In Re Interstate Trust & Banking Co. 194 So. 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
As will be noted from a reading of the decision in the Intervention of Wainer, , 152 So.
Blanchard v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co. 185 So. 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
2207, 2208 and 2209; In re Canal Bank & Trust Company, Intervention of Wainer, , 152 So.
Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Cotonio 184 So. 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
See Intervention of Wainer, In re Canal Bank & Trust Company in Liquidation, , 152 So.
Atkinson Co. v. Hibernia Nat. Bank in New Orleans 173 So. 768 La. 1937
346.70 Cotton margin certificates above described, 8,664.00 Cottonseed oil margin certificates above described, 2,707.50 Clifford Atkinson, checking and savings account, 2,041.82’" It is conceded that under the decree in the case of Intervention of Wainer (In re Canal Bank & Trust Co.), , 152 So.
Brock v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 173 So. 121 La. 1937
On June 8, 1935, after the Canal Bank & Trust Company had been placed in liquidation, the defendant, Pan American Petroleum Corporation, in its answer, tendered pleas of “facultative compensation” and of “legal compensation,” under the *611 Civil Code, and under the decision of this court in the case of In re Canal Bank & Trust Company (Intervention of Wainer), , 152 So.
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. 172 So. 421 La. 1937
Counsel argues that because the bank owned the note, compensation took place and that intervener is entitled to plead set-off, and cites the Wainer Case reported in , 152 So.
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. 170 So. 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
On the other hand, counsel for the liquidator of the Canal Bank maintains that the charge back of the account of the Shreveport Bank was ineffective, for the reason that the checks drawn on the Country Banks had been paid to the Canal Bank by the Country Banks through operation of law, and he relies upon the Wainer Case, , 152 So.
In Re Tangipahoa Bank & Trust Co. 161 So. 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
The intervener relies upon the case of In re Canal Bank & Trust Company, Intervention of Wainer, reported in , 152 So.
Watkins v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co. 162 So. 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Ann. 404 ; In re Canal Bank, etc. (Intervention of Wainer), , 152 So.
In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 162 So. 31 La. 1935
803, 808 , 95 A. L. R. 929; and In re Canal Bank & Trust Co. (Intervention of Wainer), , 152 So.
First Nat. Bank of Ruston v. Canal Bank Trust Co. 159 So. 711 La. 1935
Frierson & Co. v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 156 So. 803 La. 1934
In the Wainer Case, , 152 So.
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. 155 So. 760 La. 1934
It is conceded that this case presents the same question of compensation, or offset of deposits against the liability of the depositor to the bank, as was presented in the case entitled In re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. (Intervention of Harry Wainer), reported in , 152 So.
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. in Liquidation 154 So. 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
For a more detailed statement of the banking situation as it affected the Canal Bank & Trust Company and others similarly situated during the recent crisis in banking circles, both state and national, referenee is made to the statement of facts in the case of In re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., Intervention of Harry H. Wainer, , 152 So.