Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Foundation Finance Co. v. Robbins, 153 So. 833.

18 citing documents.

Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin 806 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
First Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Dooley 535 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
399 , (1956) ]; or whether it is a creature of contract, as in Foundation Finance Company v. Robbins, [ , 153 So.
Brass v. Minnieweather 468 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
General Inv., Inc. v. Thomas 422 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers 421 So. 2d 216 La. 1982
Distinguished American Gen. Inv. Corp. v. St. Elmo Lands 391 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
the question *573 was whether the obligation in a promissory note was enforceable because of a stipulation in the note that after default the maker would be liable for 25% attorney's fees in addition to the maximum rate of interest.
People's Nat. Bank of New Iberia v. Smith 360 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Brewer v. Scullin 353 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Jefferson Bank and Trust Company v. Post 312 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Aetna Finance Co. v. Montgomery 94 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Police Jury of Tangipahoa Parish v. Begnaud 9 So. 2d 399 La. 1942
Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co. 3 So. 2d 259 La. 1941
Daspit relies upon the statutes on which the suit of the State against the Sinclair Refining Company was founded, , 153 So.
Post Office Employees Credit Union v. Morris 178 So. 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
See Foundation Finance Co., Inc., v. Robbins, , 153 So.
Treadwell v. Columbia Casualty Co. 167 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
General American Finance System, Inc. v. Brodnax 157 So. 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Unity Plan Finance Co. v. Green 155 So. 900 La. 1934
Industrial Loan & Investment Co. v. Senseney 154 So. 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
In this case a writ of review was granted by the Supreme Court ( ), and the decision of the lower court reversed, in which decision the cases of Automobile Security Corporation v. Randazza, 17 La.
General American Finance System, Inc. v. Senseney 154 So. 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
harges in excess of those permitted by this Act shall not be charged, contracted for or received, and if any such shall be charged, contracted for or received, the contract of loan shall be void and the licensee shall have no right to collect or receive any principal, interest, or charges whatsoever.” The Supreme Court of this state, in case entitled Foundation Finance Company v. Robbins, et al., , recently decided, has forever put at rest this question.