Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Wengert, 152 So. 747.

14 citing documents.

In re the Succession of Crotty 106 So. 2d 459 La. 1958
It is well settled in this state, as said in So.
Succession of Bechtel 91 So. 2d 602 La. 1956
Succession of Goree 68 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
743 ; Succession of Wengert, 1934, , 152 So.
Succession of Solari 50 So. 2d 801 La. 1951
The appellants have cited, in opposition to the motion to dismiss, the cases of , 152 So.
Department of Wild Life and Fisheries v. the Timothy 32 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Dept. of Wild Life and Fisheries v. the Baltimore 32 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Successions of Ethridge 29 So. 2d 55 La. 1946
743 , we used the following language: “In cases of insolvency and succession, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction where ‘the fund to be distributed, whatever may be the amount therein claimed, shall exceed two thousand dollars, exclusive of interest.’ * * In , 152 So.
In Re Weinberger Banana Co. 20 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Succession of Lecompte 199 So. 122 La. 1940
In Re Ruston Creamery, Inc. 174 So. 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
General Motors Truck Co. v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Co. 172 So. 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Opposition of Roy v. Vercher 158 So. 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
The most recent expression of the Supreme Court on the question of jurisdiction, herein discussed, is in , 152 So.
Succession of Schneidau 157 So. 137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1934
Succession of Wengert 156 So. 473 La. 1934