Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Butterworth, 157 So. 121.
- Honeycutt v. Town of Boyce 327 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
-
Turner v. Bucher
308 So. 2d 270
La. 1975
11 C. Toullier, Le Droit Civil FrancoisSuivant I'ordre du Code, No. 270 (1832), 606 , 157 So.
-
Wooten v. Wimberly
272 So. 2d 303
La. 1973
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; , 157 So.
- McDonald v. Terrebonne Parish School Board 253 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Faia v. Landry 249 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
- Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 243 So. 2d 259 La. 1971
- Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 231 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
-
Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Quincy Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
220 So. 2d 104
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
4th Cir. 1963); Johnson v. *107 Butterworth, , 157 So.
- Blanchard v. Ogima 215 So. 2d 902 La. 1968
-
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge
214 So. 2d 138
La. 1968
The same responsibility attaches to the tutors of minors.” , 157 So.
- Frank v. Great American Insurance Company 196 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
- Nash v. Rapides Parish School Board 188 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
-
Stamper v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.
187 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
1003 , 1008 (1902); , 157 So.
- Boutte v. American Motorists Insurance Company 176 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
- Martin v. Sanders 163 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Scottish Union and National Insurance Co. v. Prange 154 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
- Briggs v. Iowa Mutual Insurance 150 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
- Brown v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 96 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Bourgeois v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America 60 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
- Phillips v. D'Amico 21 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
- Gott v. Scott 199 So. 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
- Heath v. Suburban Building & Loan Ass'n 163 So. 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
-
Woulfe v. D'Antoni
158 So. 394
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
cognized as dangerous to humanity and then, so far as the law is concerned, fall into the category pro hac vice of animals ferae naturae; and, then, a man who continues to keep or harbor, entirely irrespective of ownership, a domesticated animal which has by its previous history evinced the fact that it has become one of the vicious class, keeps him at his own peril.’ ” , 157 So.