Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd., 158 So. 16.

24 citing documents.

Raspanti v. Litchfield 946 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
58, 60-61 (La.App.Orleans 1934), rev'd on other grounds, , 158 So.
Wainwright v. Fontenot 750 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Hatten v. Price 663 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Our brethren of the fifth circuit stated the law applicable to the case thusly: Pharmacists are held to a high degree of care, as stated in Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Penton v. Clarkson 633 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
[4] In Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Limited, , 158 So.
Clair v. Paris Road Drugs, Inc. 573 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Broussard v. Guidry 517 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
446 , (1953); Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Broussard v. Guidry 464 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
446 , (1953); Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Cazes v. Raisinger 430 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Pharmacists are held to a high degree of care, as stated in Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Smith on Behalf of Smith v. City of Kenner 428 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
1st Cir., 1981); Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Shores v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 413 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
446 , (1953); Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter 383 So. 2d 330 La. 1980
446 , (1953); Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Pflieger v. Haws 180 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
See Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Smith v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. 124 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
121 , Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd., , 158 So.
Upshaw v. Great American Indemnity Company 112 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd., 1934, , 158 So.
Sustendal v. Weber 76 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
See Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Kennedy v. Perry Timber Co. 52 So. 2d 847 La. 1951
Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 1' 58 So.
Lobell ex rel. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Neal 48 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
See Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
In Re Nunez 14 So. 2d 680 La. 1943
551 ; and Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, , 158 So.
Bartholomew v. Impastato 12 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Marigny v. Dejoie 172 So. 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
The measure of the obligation of a pharmacist or druggist who dispenses poisons is set forth by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd., , 158 So.
Wilkinson v. City of Shreveport 165 So. 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
121, 122 ; Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd., , 158 So.
Rivoire v. Masling 162 So. 580 La. 1935
121, 122 ; Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd., , 158 So.
Commercial Nat. Bank in Shreveport v. Haas 162 So. 57 La. 1935
The facts, as alleged in plaintiff’s petition and which must be accepted as true for the purpose of disposing of the exceptions of no-cause or right of action (Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd., , 158 So.
Rome v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America 160 So. 121 La. 1935
Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Limited, , 158 So.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by