Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., 163 So. 129.
-
JC BARNES v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.
308 So. 2d 326
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
In Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., Inc. et al., , 163 So.
-
Davis v. Allstate Insurance Company
272 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
In Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., , 163 So.
-
Blanchard v. Ogima
215 So. 2d 902
La. 1968
9 (1933); Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., , 163 So.
-
Reagan v. Mid-Continent Underwriters, Inc.
150 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
19 , ; Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., Inc., , 163 So.
-
Himes v. Avinger
85 So. 2d 304
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
This ruling was affirmed on the review of this case by the Supreme Court in , 163 So.
-
Rapides Grocery Co. v. Vann
84 So. 2d 831
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
In the case of Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., Inc., , 163 So.
-
Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Co.
82 So. 2d 80
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
In opposition to these conclusions, defendant-appellee cites Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., , 163 So.
-
West v. Monroe Bakery
39 So. 2d 620
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
The Supreme Court of Louisiana held in the case of Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon Harness Co., Inc., et al., , 163 So.
-
Clostio's Heirs v. Sinclair Refining Co.
36 So. 2d 283
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
862 ; Jones v. Shehee-Ford, Wagon Harness Company, Inc., , 163 So.
-
Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
29 So. 2d 177
La. 1946
In -the case of Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., Inc., et al., , 163 So.
-
Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
23 So. 2d 765
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
In the case of Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon, etc., , 163 So.
- McCain v. Le Blanc Bros. 10 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1942
- McAllister v. Jackson Brewing Co. 6 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
-
Levin v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.
2 So. 2d 99
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
However, the issue on the right of the plaintiff to bring this suit has been joined and evidence administered under the exception of no right of action which, , 163 So.
-
Jones v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co.
189 So. 169
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
195 , to the facts of the instant case and also entertaining doubt as to the correctness of our conclusion that, the Supreme Court had held in Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., , 163 So.
-
Peavy Wilson Lumber Co. v. Cotton
188 So. 426
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., , 163 So.
-
Jones v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co.
185 So. 509
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
But in Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Company, 1935, , 163 So.
-
Bullock v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
187 So. 93
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Chief Justice O’Niell, in Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Company, reported in , 163 So.
- Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co. v. Continental Casualty Co. 170 So. 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936