Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., 158 So. 366.

15 citing documents.

Succession of Lauga 624 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
1st Cir.), rev'd in part on other grounds, , 158 So.
Western Surety Co. v. Avoyelles Farmers Co-Op. 277 So. 2d 627 La. 1973
Under these circumstances, , 158 So.
Wilson v. King 165 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
473 ; Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., , 158 So.
Succession of Onorato 51 So. 2d 804 La. 1951
This statement was quoted and expressly approved in the case of Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., , 158 So.
City Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Sav. Bank & Trust Co. 43 So. 2d 602 La. 1949
It is a contract relation which cannot be created without the consent or acquiescence of both parties.’ ” See also Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., , 158 So.
Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 30 So. 2d 841 La. 1947
by the attdrney -general, the district courts, including the court having jurisdiction in this proceeding, the depositors and those acquiring through them in the transfer of the deposits, and by the opponents in this case; further, that such construction is within the policy of this court, as will be found from expressions in some of its decisions, namely, Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., , 158 So.
In Re Standard Homestead Ass'n 22 So. 2d 119 La. 1945
417 ; Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., , 158 So.
Wren v. Brock 8 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Phillips v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 190 So. 565 La. 1939
Brock v. Citizens State Bank & Trust Co. 182 So. 679 La. 1938
The decision in the Teutonia Bank Case was approved in the case of Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Company, , 158 So.
Brough v. Presidential Fire Marine Ins. Co. 176 So. 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
133 , and Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Company, , 158 So.
In Re Interstate Trust & Banking Co. 176 So. 1 La. 1937
806 and Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Company, , 158 So.
Dowell, Inc. v. Sedberry 173 So. 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
The court in summation therein said: “If the principal can identify his property or its proceeds in the hands of his agent, the principal is entitled to .it.” The more recent case of Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Company, , 158 So.
In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 169 So. 464 La. 1936
Code, art. 3185; Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., , 158 So.
In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 160 So. 609 La. 1935
Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., , 158 So.