Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 10, 1971 245 So. 2d 478; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 22, 1950 49 So. 2d 484; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 2, 1929 119 So. 706; La., May 15, 1874 26 La. Ann. 540
Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie, 222 So. 2d 658 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Alice v. Woods 124 So. 2d 770
Opinion text
YARRUT, Judge. This suit on a promissory note was instituted by the payee-holder against the maker and endorsers. Defendants have prosecuted this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff. Appellants did not make an appearance when the case was regularly called for argument, nor have they filed a brief herein. The Appellee alone appeared, submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed. Since Appellants have not pointed out any error in the judgment of the Trial Court, and as there is no error patent on the face of the record, we must affirm that judgment under the presumption it is correct. See Alice v. Woods, La.App., 124 So.2d 770 . The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.