Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Watson v. Metropolitan Life Ins., 162 So. 790.

23 citing documents.

Delta Life Ins. Co. v. Martin 59 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
ess the same is expressly referred to in said law”, that all industrial insurance companies as well as the 'Commissioners were of the opinion that Section 2 of Act 193 o-f 1906 pertaining to non-forfeiture benefits did not apply to industrial life insurance companies and, therefore, until the decision of the Supreme Court in 1935 , 162 So.
Smith v. Washington Nat. Ins. 56 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Edwards v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 12 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
It is also conceded that, under Act No. 193 of 1906 (prior to its amendment) and the settled jurisprudence ( , 162 So.
Jacobs v. Louisiana Industrial Life Ins. Co. 12 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Edwards v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 11 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Hammon v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. 3 So. 2d 694 La. 1941
Having failed to do so, the reserve of the policy under the mandatory provisions of Section 2 of Act No. 193 of 1906, must “be applied to continue the insurance in force at its full amount * * * so long as such surrender value will purchase non-participating temporary insurance * * , 162 So.
Dominique v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co. 192 So. 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Cruze v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia 184 So. 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Smith v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co. 183 So. 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Cook v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 181 So. 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Turner v. Peoples Industrial Life Ins. Co. 180 So. 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
the case at bar the policy was issued after the enactment of the extended insurance statute and it was, therefore, governed by that statute, and, while we are shown no contractual policy stipulations giving to the insured the right, in case of lapse, to - demand reinstatement, we do find that, , 162 So.
Hooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 171 So. 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Later the Supreme Court of Louisiana, , 162 So.
American Surety Co. of New York v. Ryan 170 So. 34 La. 1936
Johnson v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia 169 So. 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Schexnayder v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co. 168 So. 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Furlong v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 169 So. 431 La. 1936
Smith v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co. 167 So. 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Devine v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. of Nashville 166 So. 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 162 So. 799 La. 1935
Cryer v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 162 So. 804 La. 1935
On the merits, , 162 So.
Foley v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 162 So. 798 La. 1935
Crump v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 162 So. 800 La. 1935
Defendant also set up, alternatively, , 162 So.
Williams v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 162 So. 803 La. 1935