Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Co., 161 So. 191.
- Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Ernest L. Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Marsh Engineering Inc. v. Parker 883 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corp.
690 So. 2d 86
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Edwards v. *89 Royal Indemnity Co., , 161 So.
- Descant v. Adm'rs of Tulane Educ. Fund 639 So. 2d 246 La. 1994
- Descant v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 627 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Liberty Mut. Ins. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. 579 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Castille v. Chaisson 544 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- Van Pelt v. Morgan City Power Boat Ass'n, Inc. 489 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Danzy v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 380 So. 2d 1356 La. 1980
-
Danzy v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
373 So. 2d 995
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In disposing of this *999 issue favorable to the insurer the court stated: “In Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Co., [ , 161 So.
- Von Dameck v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. 361 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Guidry v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 359 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Callais v. Allstate Insurance Co. 334 So. 2d 692 La. 1976
-
Jagers v. Royal Indemnity Company
276 So. 2d 309
La. 1973
Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Co. [ , 161 So.
- Wooten v. Wimberly 254 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 243 So. 2d 259 La. 1971
- Webb v. Zurich Insurance Company 205 So. 2d 398 La. 1967
- Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 174 So. 2d 122 La. 1965
- Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 174 So. 2d 122 La. 1965
- Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 164 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
- Dowden v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 158 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
- Musmeci v. American Automobile Insurance Company 146 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
- Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 136 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
- Dumas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 134 So. 2d 45 La. 1961
-
Stockwell v. Gulf Engineering Co.
83 So. 2d 386
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
art. 2098 (relating to codebtors in solido) , 161 So.
- Trappey v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 77 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
- Gremillion v. Caffey 71 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- McDowell v. National Sur. Corp. 68 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Addison v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 64 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Chapman v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 45 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
-
Burke v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co.
24 So. 2d 875
La. 1946
Act 55 of 1930; , 161 So.
- Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. 23 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
- Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 13 So. 2d 245 La. 1943
-
Scarborough v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.
11 So. 2d 52
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
As in that case also, , 161 So.
- Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 8 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Harvey v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 6 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Mock v. Maryland Casualty Co. 6 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. Fontenot 4 So. 2d 634 La. 1941
- Lewis v. State 200 So. 265 La. 1941
-
Dandridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
192 So. 887
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
“The law on the point seems to have been settled by the courts of Louisiana in: , 161 So.
-
Rome v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America
169 So. 132
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1936
However, in our opinion, ' , 161 So.
-
Loustalot v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass'n
164 So. 183
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
based on the language in the last paragraph of the act to the effect that it is: “The intent of this act that any action brought hereunder shall be subject to all of the lawful conditions of the policy contract and the defenses which could be urged by the insurer to a direct action brought by the insured.” , 161 So.
-
Ruiz v. Clancy
162 So. 734
La. 1935
The ruling in the Vitale Case was referred to with approval in the opinion rendered in the case of Mrs. Carmen F. Palmer Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Co. , 161 So.