DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Union Power Co., 162 So. 37.

25 citing documents.

  • Marathon Ins. Co. v. Warner 244 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
  • Armour v. Smith 170 So. 2d 347 La. 1964
  • Roberts v. Cooper 127 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    These requirements have been considered and discussed by our Supreme Court in a number of cases, among which we particularly note Frost Lumber Industries, , 162 So.
  • Alexander v. Holt 116 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    These requirements have been considered and discussed by our Supreme Court in a number of *537 cases, among which we particularly note Frost Lumber Industries, , 162 So.
  • Hinchee v. Long Bell Petroleum Co. 103 So. 2d 84 La. 1958
  • Brown v. Mayfield 92 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    These requirements have been considered and discussed by our Supreme Court in a number of cases, among which we particularly note Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., v. Union Power Co., , 162 So.
  • Delta Refining Co. v. Bankhead 73 So. 2d 302 La. 1954
  • Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Miller 69 So. 2d 21 La. 1953
  • Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Thompson 64 So. 2d 202 La. 1953
    See Frost Lumber Industries v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.
  • Wise v. Watkins 62 So. 2d 653 La. 1952
    75 ; Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.
  • Placid Oil Co. v. George 49 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    These requirements have been considered and discussed by our Supreme Court in a number of cases, among which we particularly note Frost Lumber Industries, , 162 So.
  • Hitzman v. Ethyl Corporation 42 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    Such was the opinion of every member of this court when the case of Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.
  • James v. Noble 36 So. 2d 722 La. 1948
    Some of the most recent cases, reviewing the jurisprudence on the subject matter, are the cases of Frost Lumber Industries, , 162 So.
  • Spears v. Nesbitt 2 So. 2d 650 La. 1941
    15 ; Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.
  • Achee v. Caillouet 1 So. 2d 530 La. 1941
  • Hightower v. Maritzky 195 So. 518 La. 1940
  • Levy v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Ltd. 194 So. 772 La. 1940
  • Cox v. Acme Land & Investment Co. 188 So. 742 La. 1939
  • Vincent v. Bullock 187 So. 35 La. 1939
    15 , and Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.
  • Goldsmith v. McCoy 182 So. 519 La. 1938
    15 ; Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.
  • English v. Blackman 179 So. 306 La. 1938
    We said: “There must be more than a bare acknowledgment; the acknowledgment must be accompanied by or coupled with ‘the purpose and intention of the party making the acknowledgment to interrupt the prescription then running.’ ” , 162 So.
  • Kennedy v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co. 178 So. 359 La. 1938
  • Ventress v. Akin 177 So. 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    v. Union Power Company, , 162 So.
  • Coyle v. North Central Texas Oil Co. 174 So. 274 La. 1937
    Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.
  • Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co. 171 So. 75 La. 1936
    There must be more than a bare acknowledgment; the acknowledgment must be accompanied by or coupled with “the purpose and intention of the party making the acknowledgment to interrupt the prescription then running.” Such was the opinion of every member of this court when the case of Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., v. Union Power Co., Inc., , 162 So.