Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ruiz v. Clancy, 162 So. 734.

38 citing documents.

Lettie Caruso v. Rodney Wooten And Arch Insurance Company La. 2020
1096, 1117, (1961); 162 So.
Walker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 765 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Brown v. Coregis Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Descant v. Adm'rs of Tulane Educ. Fund 639 So. 2d 246 La. 1994
1096, 1117 , (1961); , 162 So.
Descant v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 627 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co. 571 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Freyoux v. Estate of Bousegard 484 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Plaintiffs argue that as a , 162 So.
Danzy v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 380 So. 2d 1356 La. 1980
Danzy v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 373 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Von Dameck v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. 361 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Guidry v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 359 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Callais v. Allstate Insurance Co. 334 So. 2d 692 La. 1976
Wooten v. Wimberly 254 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 243 So. 2d 259 La. 1971
Webb v. Zurich Insurance Company 205 So. 2d 398 La. 1967
Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 164 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
App. Orl., ), is essentially imposed "for the protection of family control and harmony" and to avoid disturbance by such suits of "the family relations", , 162 So.
Johnson v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 163 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 136 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
191 (1935); Ruiz v. Clancy, et al., , 162 So.
Dumas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 134 So. 2d 45 La. 1961
Ensminger v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. 134 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
See also Ruiz v. Clancy et al., 1935, , 162 So.
Martin v. Mud Supply Company 111 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Gremillion v. Caffey 71 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Addison v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 64 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Home Ins. Co. v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 62 So. 2d 828 La. 1952
Chapman v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 45 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. 23 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
The Supreme Court, , 162 So.
Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 13 So. 2d 245 La. 1943
Harvey v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 6 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
that the statute confers upon the wife the right to bring a direct action against her husband's insurer for damages resulting from his negligence and that the insurer cannot urge as a defense the wife's incapacity to sue her husband because such defense is personal to him, citing, in support of this contention, the following cases: Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Company, supra; , 162 So.
Mock v. Maryland Casualty Co. 6 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Lipscomb v. News Star World Pub. Corporation 5 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Dandridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 192 So. 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Coffey v. Ouachita River Lumber Co. 191 So. 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. DeParcq, 8 Cir., 66 F.2d 678 ; , 162 So.
Phillips v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 190 So. 565 La. 1939
Massony v. Truett Nash Motor Co. 177 So. 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1938
Rome v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America 169 So. 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1936
The opinion in the Loustalot Case seeks to distinguish the case of Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Company, supra, by quoting from the opinion of Chief Justice O’ , 162 So.
Robbins v. Short 165 So. 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Johnson v. Continental Casualty Co. 164 So. 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Loustalot v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass'n 164 So. 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Mr. Chief Justice O’Neill said of that case, , 162 So.