DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kees v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., 162 So. 817.

15 citing documents.

  • Garnett v. Battistella 485 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • International Paper Co. v. Masters 103 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    111 , ; Chamberlain v. Abadie, 1896, 48 La.Ann.
  • Martin v. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. 81 So. 2d 852 La. 1955
    111 , , the knowledge of a defect in title may not be imputed to the corporation even though the attorney might have had such knowledge, is clearly without merit; a reading of the opinion will readily disclose its inapplicability from both a factual and a legal standpoint, since the attorney in that case, representing Himse
  • Martin v. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. 76 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    111 , ; Smith v. Southern Kraft Corp., supra.
  • Veltin v. Haas 21 So. 2d 862 La. 1945
  • Dupuy v. Joly 200 So. 806 La. 1941
    111 , ; Baldwin v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co., 185 La.
  • Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
    111 , ; Ruth v. Buwe, 185 La.
  • Long v. Chailan 199 So. 222 La. 1940
  • Martel v. Hunt 197 So. 402 La. 1940
    111 , , the possession relied upon and held, sufficient to support the plea of prescription was that a tram railway had been built on the land and all of the merchantable pine timber, removed therefrom over a period of three months, and the railroad track remained on the land and was used for hauling other timber for a peri
  • Garner v. Sims 185 So. 27 La. 1938
    111 , ; Ruth v. Buwe, 185 La.
  • Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
  • Scott v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 174 So. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
  • Baldwin v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. 171 So. 442 La. 1936
  • Ruth v. Buwe 168 So. 776 La. 1936
    111 , , we held that, in order to constitute possession in good faith under which a prescriptive title might be acquired, the possessor had to occupy the property by virtue of a title valid in form and acquired from one whom he believed to be the owner of the property.
  • Ruth v. Buwe 168 So. 776 La. 1936
    111 , , we held that, in order to constitute possession in good faith under which a prescriptive title might be acquired, the possessor had to occupy the property by virtue of a title valid in form and acquired from one whom he believed to be the owner of the property.