Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kees v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., 162 So. 817.
-
Garnett v. Battistella
485 So. 2d 929
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
503, 3451 (1870); Barrios, supra; , 162 So.
-
International Paper Co. v. Masters
103 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
782 ; Kees v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, 1935, , 162 So.
-
Martin v. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co.
81 So. 2d 852
La. 1955
The defendant’s , 162 So.
- Martin v. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. 76 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Veltin v. Haas 21 So. 2d 862 La. 1945
- Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Board of Com'rs 12 So. 2d 235 La. 1943
- Dupuy v. Joly 200 So. 806 La. 1941
- Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
- Long v. Chailan 199 So. 222 La. 1940
- Martel v. Hunt 197 So. 402 La. 1940
- Garner v. Sims 185 So. 27 La. 1938
- Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
- Scott v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 174 So. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
- Baldwin v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. 171 So. 442 La. 1936
-
Ruth v. Buwe
168 So. 776
La. 1936
The possessor in bad faith is he who possesses as master, but who assumes this quality, when he well knows that he has no title to the thing, or that his title is vicious and defective.” , 162 So.
-
Ruth v. Buwe
168 So. 776
La. 1936
The possessor in bad faith is he who possesses as master, but who assumes this quality, when he well knows that he has no title to the thing, or that his title is vicious and defective.” *211 , 162 So.