Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., 162 So. 806.

24 citing documents.

Jacks v. Banister Pipelines America 418 So. 2d 524 La. 1982
Lacour v. Highlands Insurance Co. 247 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
185 (1935) and McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Duplantis v. Highlands Insurance 221 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Allen v. Herrin Transportation Co. 192 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Anderson v. Continental Can Company 141 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Miller v. General Chemical Division 128 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Ernest v. Martin Timber Co. 124 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
We, therefore, , 162 So.
Green v. Anderson 38 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
This is clearly the holding of the Supreme Court in the cases of McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Guillot v. Weaver Brothers Thompson Lumber Co. 31 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
388 ; McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Washington v. Independent Ice & Cold Storage Co. 30 So. 2d 758 La. 1947
Storm v. Johnson 23 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Jones v. Chicago Mill Lumber Co. 15 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
185 ; McGruder v. Service Drayage Company, Inc., , 162 So.
Jones v. International Paper Co. 11 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
185 ; McGruder v. Service Drayage Company, Inc., , 162 So.
Langston v. Hanbury 11 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
185 ; McGruder v. Service Drayage Company, Inc., , 162 So.
Lorch v. American Can Co. Southern 5 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc. 196 So. 23 La. 1940
Hester v. Industrial Lumber Co. 185 So. 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Leday v. Lake Charles Pipe & Supply Co. 185 So. 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
This is clearly the holding of the Supreme Court in the cases of McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Ellis v. Gullett Gin Co. 182 So. 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
185 ; McGruder v. Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Hibbard v. Blane 183 So. 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Under such, circumstances the courts have repeatedly held that the general, rather than specific, provision of the statute applies.” McGruder v. Service Drayage *42 Co., , 162 So.
Harris v. Southern Carbon Co. 181 So. 469 La. 1938
ourt and awarding 125 weeks’ compensation for the permanent total loss of the use of a foot, instead of affirming the judgment for general disability, if the court concluded on the facts that plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled, is not the law and is contrary to the holding of this court in the case of Barr v. Davis Lumber Company, supra, and McGruder v. *999 Service Drayage Co., Inc., , 162 So.
Ingram v. Meridian Lumber Co. 178 So. 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Riviere v. McClintic-marshall Corporation 177 So. 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
' McGruder v. Service Drayage Company, Inc., , 162 So.
Custer v. New Orleans Paper Box Factory, Inc. 170 So. 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
But our interpretation of that opinion proved to be incorrect, for, after granting a writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court in , 162 So.