Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tripani v. Meraux, 165 So. 453.

35 citing documents.

Pepper v. Triplet 864 So. 2d 181 La. 2004
14-7, p. 346 (Michie 1996) (hereinafter Maraist & Galligan); , 165 So.
Edmond v. Webre 413 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Hawthorne Oil & Gas Corp. v. Continental Oil Co. 377 So. 2d 285 La. 1979
Schexnider v. Allstate Insurance Company 304 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Holland v. Buckley 305 So. 2d 113 La. 1974
The syllabus in this case, , 165 So.
Clement v. Redi-Bilt Corporation 249 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Fall v. Manuel 228 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Cartwright v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ 223 So. 2d 822 La. 1969
(These cases are legion, i. e., , 165 So.
Jowers v. Pleasant 220 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Campbell v. Scroggins 191 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Bernard v. Hungerford 157 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Tripani v. *249 Meraux, , 165 So.
Anglade v. Hemenway Furniture Co. 151 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Bourgeois v. Beeson-Warner Insurance Agency, Inc. 144 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
The provisions of the article are very explicit and unambiguous, , 165 So.
Colomb v. McDonald 131 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
This interpretation is enunciated in Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
Steckler v. Continental Oil Co. 129 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Smith v. Adger 126 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
In Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
Town of Eunice v. M & L Construction Co. 123 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Parker v. Young 122 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
This interpretation is enunciated in Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
Briley v. Mitchell 110 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
This interpretation is enunciated in Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
Harris v. Roy 108 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
This interpretation is enunciated in Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
City of New Orleans v. United Cab Owners, Inc. 96 So. 2d 14 La. 1957
In that case, we said: “The basis of the plaintiff’s cause of action is the alleged trespass by the defendant upon its real estate and its real survitudes through the alleged ultra vires and unlawful acts of the defendant in forcefully seizing and divesting the plaintiff of its real property and causing the damages alleged to have been sustained.” , 165 So.
Gibbs v. Booth Stanfill 94 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1957
The interpretation of the word “trespass”, as used in the ninth paragraph of Article 165, , 165 So.
White v. Lockhart 86 So. 2d 397 La. 1956
Ansardi v. Potter 71 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
This, interpretation is enunciated in Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
Alfred v. Lee 71 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
This interpretation is enunciated in Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
Thigpen v. Stockman 66 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Having failed to prove that it was unlawful for the horse to be on Highway No. 7 and having failed to prove that the defendant was guilty of some fault or negligence in his ownership or possession of the animal, he cannot recover under Article 2321 , 165 So.
Raziano v. TJ James & Co. 57 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
This interpretation is enunciated in Tripani v. Meraux, 1936, , 165 So.
Armand v. Bordelon 53 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc. 21 So. 2d 510 La. 1945
State v. Younger 20 So. 2d 305 La. 1944
Fourth Jefferson Drainage Dist. v. City of New Orleans 14 So. 2d 482 La. 1943
foreign corporation shall commit trespass, or do anything for which an action for damage lies or where any domestic or foreign corporation shall fail to do anything for which an action for damage lies, such person, firm or corporation may be sued in the parish where such damage is done or trespass committed or at the domicile of such person, firm or corporation.” , 165 So.
Hayes v. Oertel 195 So. 388 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1940
Esthay v. McCain 185 So. 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1939
It was earnestly urged in the application for a , 165 So.
Esthay v. McCain 180 So. 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1938
O'Brien v. Delta Air Corporations 178 So. 489 La. 1938