Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tyler v. Walt, 167 So. 182.
-
Rogers v. Integrated Exploration & Prod., LLC
265 So. 3d 880
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In support of their arguments, Zurich and AGLIC rely on Tyler v. Walt , , 167 So.
- Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co. 575 So. 2d 336 La. 1991
-
Champion v. Panel Era Mfg. Co.
410 So. 2d 1230
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
4th Cir. 1963); , 167 So.
- LOUISIANA & SO. LIFE INS. CO. v. New Orleans SS 384 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Louisiana & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. New Orleans Steamship Ass'n, International Longshoremen's Ass'n (AF of L-CIO) Welfare … 384 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Canter v. Koehring Company 283 So. 2d 716 La. 1973
- Victory Electric Works, Inc. v. Maryland Cas. Co. 230 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
-
Succession of Robinson
218 So. 2d 383
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
295 , (1941); Tyler v. Walt, et al., , 167 So.
-
Gateway Barge Line, Inc. v. RB Tyler Company
175 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
A typical decision in this line is the case of Tyler vs. Walt et al., , 167 So.
- Lacour v. Merchants Trust and Savings Bank 153 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
- Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's 140 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
- Schouest v. Texas Crude Oil Co. 141 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
- Southwestern S. & M. Co. v. Industrial Mollasses Corp. 135 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
- First Fed. S. & L. Ass'n v. Continental Equity L. Ins. Co. 124 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
- Prieto Lumber Co. v. Shoultz 111 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Winsberg v. Winsberg 96 So. 2d 44 La. 1957
- Banks v. Kent Piling Co. 87 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Succession of Valdez 44 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1950
-
Sun Oil Co. v. Smith
43 So. 2d 148
La. 1949
122 , L.R.A.1915A, 200, Ann.Cas.1915C, 717; , 167 So.
- Jones v. Williams 39 So. 2d 746 La. 1949
-
De Maupassant v. Clayton
38 So. 2d 791
La. 1949
1915C, 717; Tyler v. Walt, et al., , 167 So.
-
Slaton v. King
36 So. 2d 648
La. 1948
122 , L.R.A.1915A 200, Ann.Cas.1915C, 717; , 167 So.
-
Janney v. Calmes
33 So. 2d 510
La. 1947
ge said: “ ‘There is nothing in the record to show that the judicial declarations of Mrs. Frost, referred to in the plea of estoppel, in any wise deceived or misled, or damaged the plaintiffs, and without such showing, it is *386 my opinion that the plea of estoppel is not good/ “And he further stated (and correctly so) that the law of this State, , 167 So.
- Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe Stores 14 So. 2d 10 La. 1943
- Mounger v. Ferrell 11 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Kramer v. Freeman 3 So. 2d 609 La. 1941
-
Sanderson v. Frost
3 So. 2d 626
La. 1941
ct Judge said: “There is nothing in the record to show that the judicial declarations of Mrs. Frost, referred to in the plea of estoppel, in any wise deceived or misled, or damaged the plaintiffs, and without such showing, it is my opinion that the plea of estoppel is not good.” And he further stated (and correctly so) that the.law of this State, as laid down in the ' , 167 So.