Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite First Nat. Bank of Ruston v. Jones, 172 So. 155.
- Lane v. Lane 375 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
- White v. White 233 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Broussard v. Broussard 132 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
- Johnston v. Bearden 127 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
-
Burch v. Nichols
126 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
631 ; First National Bank of Ruston v. Jones,, , 172 So.
- Smith v. Smith 119 So. 2d 827 La. 1960
- Andrews v. Lalumia 115 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
-
City of New Orleans v. Levy
98 So. 2d 210
La. 1957
When such a prima facie case is established, the burden of evidence is shifted to the adverse party; the adverse party may, by the production of evidence destroying the prima facie case against him, satisfy the burden and restore it to the original party.” , 172 So.
-
State Board of Medical Examiners v. McHenery
69 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
"See also First National Bank of Ruston v. Jones, [ ,] 172 So.
- Olivier's Minor Children v. Olivier 40 So. 2d 803 La. 1949
-
Reeves v. Felder
6 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
See, also, Article 1921, R.C.C., , 172 So.
- Chelette v. Chelette 5 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Conway v. Imperial Life Ins. Co. 5 So. 2d 314 La. 1941
-
Williams v. Watts
195 So. 54
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
When, under such circumstances, they fail to furnish the evidence clearly within their power, all the presumptions of law are against them.” , 172 So.