Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eisenhardt, 169 So. 417.
- State v. Cushman 481 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
- State v. Craig 340 So. 2d 191 La. 1976
- State v. Link 301 So. 2d 339 La. 1974
- State v. Augustine 215 So. 2d 634 La. 1968
- State v. Plaisance 210 So. 2d 323 La. 1968
-
State v. Hopper
203 So. 2d 222
La. 1967
Also it may be in the form of a letter or of several letters to different persons, or may consist of detached conversations with many people, or it may be a formal confession, or all of these together.’ 16 Corpus Juris, 715, verbo ‘Criminal Law,’ and authorities cited in foot-notes.” , 169 So.
- State v. Whisenant 175 So. 2d 293 La. 1965
- State v. James 128 So. 2d 21 La. 1961
- State v. Jenkins 107 So. 2d 632 La. 1958
- State v. Chinn 87 So. 2d 315 La. 1956
- State v. Swails 76 So. 2d 523 La. 1954
-
Distinguished
State v. Whatley
76 So. 2d 543
La. 1954
y were not sufficient for the doctor to base an opinion upon, we think the defendant’s, remedy was to rebut this testimony with, *505 ■other medical testimony and certainly not to ask the Court to rule that the doctor did not know what he was talking about.” In insisting that the physicians’ opinions were not predicated on sufficient facts, , 169 So.
- State v. Bentley 54 So. 2d 137 La. 1951
- State v. Leming 46 So. 2d 262 La. 1950
- State v. Wright 41 So. 2d 76 La. 1949
- State v. Cook 39 So. 2d 898 La. 1949
- State v. Frazier 24 So. 2d 620 La. 1946
- State v. Gunter 23 So. 2d 305 La. 1945
- State v. Ward 22 So. 2d 740 La. 1945
- State v. Sample 14 So. 2d 678 La. 1943
- State v. Dierlamm 180 So. 135 La. 1938
- State v. Pierre 180 So. 630 La. 1938
- State v. Matthews 179 So. 69 La. 1938
- State v. McManus 174 So. 91 La. 1937