Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rottman v. Beverly, 165 So. 153.
- Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
Dowe v. Grady
540 So. 2d 1040
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
2d Cir.1985), writs denied , 366 (La.1985); , 165 So.
- Harrison v. Keller 524 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Bennett v. State Dept. of Transp. & Development 503 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- Torres v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co. 499 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- Garrett v. Celino 489 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- Bourgeois v. Jones 481 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- Thissel v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 476 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
Elliott v. Eaves
476 So. 2d 388
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Baumgartner, supra; , 165 So.
- Finley v. North Assur. Co. of America 476 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- Perrodin v. Zander 441 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Courtade v. Tucker 421 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Smith v. Millers Mut. Ins. Co.
419 So. 2d 59
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Applying the set of facts most favorable to the defendant, , 165 So.
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Nero 415 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Dufrene v. Dixie Auto Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 162 La. 1979
- Baumgartner v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 356 So. 2d 400 La. 1978
- Miller v. Carter 346 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Mitchell v. Sigrest 345 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Pierre v. Landry 341 So. 2d 891 La. 1977
- Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 338 So. 2d 600 La. 1976
- Ritter v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 321 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- Kontomitras v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 314 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
- Dixon v. Copeland 289 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Kemp v. Kennedy 283 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Dufrene v. Miller 266 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
- Sistrunk v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 267 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
-
Sholar v. US Fire Insurance Company
261 So. 2d 327
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
3d Cir. 1968); , 165 So.
- Leake v. Prudhomme Truck Tank Service, Inc. 258 So. 2d 358 La. 1972
-
Lewis v. Allstate Insurance Co.
250 So. 2d 155
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
While this principle is so well settled as to obviate the citation of authorities therefor, , 165 So.
- Distinguished Morales v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 246 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Mabile v. Thibaut Farms 244 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Gibson v. Kansas City Southern Railroad 233 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Sanders v. National Surety Corp. 230 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
-
Fontenot v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
228 So. 2d 327
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
1st Cir. 1955); , 165 So.
- Corkern v. McWilliams 228 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Sanders v. Eilers 217 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Price v. Watts 215 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 214 So. 2d 138 La. 1968
- Valenti v. Courtney 206 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Valenti v. Courtney 206 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Fletcher v. Berard 198 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- McCartney v. Allstate Insurance Co. 197 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Venero v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 196 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Simms v. Sims 181 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
- Howard v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 179 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
-
Sanford v. Thompson
174 So. 2d 865
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
With the requirements of these doctrines, as laid down by the court in Guillory v. Allstate Insurance Company, (La.App.1957) , and Rottman v. Beverly, (1936) , 165 So.
- Evans v. Thorpe 175 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
- Lanaux v. Marquette Casualty Co. 162 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Regan v. Vincent
162 So. 2d 79
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
denied), the court said: “The doctrine of ‘discovered peril;’ ‘apparent peril,’ or ‘last clear chance’ confirmed by the landmark cases of Rottman v. Beverly, et al., , 165 So.